3rd generation zotarolimus-eluting stent non- inferior to everolimus

Original title: Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomized, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Reference: Von Birgelen C et al. The Lancet. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

In the 3rd generation zotarolimus-eluting stent, platform was modified to increase flexibility and make implant easier in complex lesions. This study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of 2 drug-eluting stents commonly used in clinical practice that had not yet been compared in unselected patients. Between November 2010 and May 2012 this work randomized 1811 patients with de novo lesions receiving the 3rd generation zotarolimus -eluting Resolute Integrity stent (Medtronic , Santa Rosa, CA) or everolimus eluting Promus Element stent ( Boston Scientific, Natick, MA ) .

The primary end point was target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, infarct related to vessel or revascularization justified by clinical after one year. Of the total, 370 patients (20 %) were admitted pursuing a ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 447 (25 %) Non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The primary end point was observed in 55 (6%) of patients receiving the zotarolimus-eluting stent versus 47 (5%) of those receiving everolimus eluting stent. With these results, the Resolute Integrity stent reached the criterion for noninferiority with an absolute risk difference of 0.88 % (p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed separately analyzing each of the points of the primary end point. Stent thrombosis, either definite or definite/probable, was similar and less than 1% for both devices. 

Conclusion

Both stents showed similar safety and efficacy with an excellent clinical outcome at one year, especially considering the large number of patients enrolled with acute coronary syndrome.

Editorial comment

This new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents, first time evaluated in a randomized study, achieved better results than the previous generation had shown in the RESOLUTE All Comers with a similar population.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...