3rd generation zotarolimus-eluting stent non- inferior to everolimus

Original title: Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomized, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Reference: Von Birgelen C et al. The Lancet. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

In the 3rd generation zotarolimus-eluting stent, platform was modified to increase flexibility and make implant easier in complex lesions. This study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of 2 drug-eluting stents commonly used in clinical practice that had not yet been compared in unselected patients. Between November 2010 and May 2012 this work randomized 1811 patients with de novo lesions receiving the 3rd generation zotarolimus -eluting Resolute Integrity stent (Medtronic , Santa Rosa, CA) or everolimus eluting Promus Element stent ( Boston Scientific, Natick, MA ) .

The primary end point was target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, infarct related to vessel or revascularization justified by clinical after one year. Of the total, 370 patients (20 %) were admitted pursuing a ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 447 (25 %) Non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The primary end point was observed in 55 (6%) of patients receiving the zotarolimus-eluting stent versus 47 (5%) of those receiving everolimus eluting stent. With these results, the Resolute Integrity stent reached the criterion for noninferiority with an absolute risk difference of 0.88 % (p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed separately analyzing each of the points of the primary end point. Stent thrombosis, either definite or definite/probable, was similar and less than 1% for both devices. 

Conclusion

Both stents showed similar safety and efficacy with an excellent clinical outcome at one year, especially considering the large number of patients enrolled with acute coronary syndrome.

Editorial comment

This new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents, first time evaluated in a randomized study, achieved better results than the previous generation had shown in the RESOLUTE All Comers with a similar population.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Polymer-Free vs. Biodegradable Polymer Stents: SORT OUT IX 5-Year Outcomes

In a constant strive to achieve life time management, interventional cardiologists focus on optimizing coronary scaffolds, which calls for the development of devices with...

Chronic Stent Recoil and Its Long-Term Effects

The evolution of stent technology—including new scaffold designs, thinner struts, and more biocompatible polymers—has brought about an emerging concern: the late loss of structural...

PROSPECT II Substudy: Relationship Between Different Levels of hs-CRP and Vulnerable Plaque Characteristics in Patients with NSTEMI

Inflammation plays a key role in the onset and progression of atherosclerosis and has been linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular events, regardless...

Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 Month of ACS: Subgroup Analysis Based on Bleeding Risk and MI Type

Current guidelines still recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the standard treatment in patients with acute...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Heterotopic Treatment of the Tricuspid Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has been associated to high morbimortality, mainly due to the development of cardiac failure, peripheral edema, ascites, kidney failure and cardiohepatic...

Polymer-Free vs. Biodegradable Polymer Stents: SORT OUT IX 5-Year Outcomes

In a constant strive to achieve life time management, interventional cardiologists focus on optimizing coronary scaffolds, which calls for the development of devices with...

Three-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Therapy with Balloon-Expandable Valves in the United States

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral Valve-in-Valve (MViV) implantation with balloon-expandable valves has become a solid alternative for patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses. However,...