3rd generation zotarolimus-eluting stent non- inferior to everolimus

Original title: Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomized, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Reference: Von Birgelen C et al. The Lancet. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

In the 3rd generation zotarolimus-eluting stent, platform was modified to increase flexibility and make implant easier in complex lesions. This study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of 2 drug-eluting stents commonly used in clinical practice that had not yet been compared in unselected patients. Between November 2010 and May 2012 this work randomized 1811 patients with de novo lesions receiving the 3rd generation zotarolimus -eluting Resolute Integrity stent (Medtronic , Santa Rosa, CA) or everolimus eluting Promus Element stent ( Boston Scientific, Natick, MA ) .

The primary end point was target vessel failure defined as cardiac death, infarct related to vessel or revascularization justified by clinical after one year. Of the total, 370 patients (20 %) were admitted pursuing a ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 447 (25 %) Non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The primary end point was observed in 55 (6%) of patients receiving the zotarolimus-eluting stent versus 47 (5%) of those receiving everolimus eluting stent. With these results, the Resolute Integrity stent reached the criterion for noninferiority with an absolute risk difference of 0.88 % (p = 0.006). No significant differences were observed separately analyzing each of the points of the primary end point. Stent thrombosis, either definite or definite/probable, was similar and less than 1% for both devices. 

Conclusion

Both stents showed similar safety and efficacy with an excellent clinical outcome at one year, especially considering the large number of patients enrolled with acute coronary syndrome.

Editorial comment

This new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents, first time evaluated in a randomized study, achieved better results than the previous generation had shown in the RESOLUTE All Comers with a similar population.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...