Chronic total occlusions, a true challenge

Original title: Procedural Outcomes of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Report From the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Reference: Emanuel S. Brilakis, et al. JACC Cardiovascular Intervention 2015;8:245-53

Chronic total occlusions (CTO) are present in 20% to 50% of pathological coronary angiograms but, even though this percentage has increased in the past years, PCI is performed in around 4% of this kind of lesions.

This study included 594,510 stable patients; 22,365 of them (3.8%) received CTO PCI. Patients presenting CTO were younger, more frequently men, often with prior infarction, prior PCI and ventricular failure.

Procedural success was lower for CTO (59% vs. 96%; p<0.001), with marked variability in centers and operators. Procedural success was associated to the annual volume of CTO PCIs of operators, 10 being 53%, 62% and 75% (p<0.001). The group requiring vessel revascularization required greater contrast volume and longer fluoroscopy time.

Procedural success also increased with operator experience, 55.5% in 2009 to 61.9% in 2013 (p<0.01). Multivariable analysis associated lower procedural success to age, smoking, previous myocardial infarction, previous CABG, previous peripheral heart disease, right coronary artery CTO target vessel and less operator experience.

Combined events resulted higher in CTO PCIs than in conventional PCIs (1.6% vs. 0.8% p<0.001). More operator experience was associated to a lower events risk.

Conclusion

CTO PCI is not frequent in USA in stable patients and is associated to a lower procedural success and a higher complications rate, compared to outcomes in patients that do not present CTO. Success is associated with patient characteristics and operator experience.

Editorial Comment

When performing CTI success will depend on operator and center. Different studies have shown the benefits of revascularization, especially when it comes to the anterior descending artery.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation– Argentina

Carlos Fava

Previous article
Next article

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...