CTO revascularization is beneficial

Título original: Long-Term Survival Benefit of Revascularization Compared UIT Medical Therapy in Practice UIT Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion and Well-Developed Collateral Circulation. Reference: Woo Jin Jan, el at. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2015;8:271-9

Multiple studies have shown the benefit of chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization, but for patients presenting Rentrop 3 grade collateral circulation (CC), such benefit remains unclear.

The study included 738 patients presenting at least one Rentrop 3 grade CTO, symptomatic and silent ischemia patients, and excluded patients with a history of revascularization, cardiogenic shock, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or acute ST elevation myocardial infarction 48hs prior to procedure.

Primary end point was death during follow up and secondary end points were all cause death, infarction, repeat revascularization and combined events (MACE). 236 patients (32%) received medical treatment and 502 were treated with revascularization procedures (170 CABG and 332 with PCI). 

Those treated with revascularization were younger, dislipemic, with ACS, higher ejection fraction and shorter catheterization history. The extent of heart failure was similar in both groups.

Follow up was 42 months. Multivariable analysis revealed a lower incidence of cardiac death (HR 0.29; CI 95% 0.15 to 0.58; p<0.01) and MACE (HR 0.32; CI 95% 0.21 to 0.49 p<0.01) in favor of the revascularization group. After propensity score matching, the incidence of death and MACE still favored the revascularization group. There were no differences in CABG and PCI, except for the higher rate of repeat revascularization.

Conclusion

In CTO patients and good collateral circulation, revascularization reduce the risk of cardiac death and combined events.

Editorial Comment

Previous studies had shown that good collateral circulation was beneficial for the evolution and this analysis shows it is even better when patients are treated with revascularization procedures, being PCI a valid alternative with a higher rate of repeat revascularization but with no difference in mortality.

Gentileza del Dr Carlos Fava
Cardiólogo Intervencionista
Fundación Favaloro – Argentina

Carlos Fava

More articles by this author

Complex PCI: higher ischemic and bleeding risk in contemporary practice

Advances in pharmacological therapies, equipment, and devices have enabled percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to be performed in a growing number of patients with a...

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Complex PCI: higher ischemic and bleeding risk in contemporary practice

Advances in pharmacological therapies, equipment, and devices have enabled percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to be performed in a growing number of patients with a...

Coil embolization of segmental arteries as a spinal cord protection strategy prior to complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta

Spinal cord ischemia remains one of the most devastating complications in the repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with incidences of up to 20–30% in extensive...

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...