ELISA 3: Early vs. late invasive strategy in patients without high-risk ST elevation

The invasive strategy is preferred to treat patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but the ideal time for the procedure is controversial. This study randomized 542 patients with acute coronary syndrome without high-risk ST elevation to carry out immediate (invasive treatment within 12 hours) or late treatment (after 48 hours). The primary endpoint was a combination of death, re-infarction and recurrent ischemia at 30 days. The secondary endpoint was the extent of myocardial damage as measured by troponin level 72-96 hours after admission and the percentage of patients with increased CK-MB during hospitalization. 

The median time to angiography for the early invasive group was 2.6 hours and 54.9 hours for the late invasive group. There was no difference in the primary endpoint between the two groups (9.9% vs 14.2% respectively, p=0.135). There were also no differences in the secondary endpoints. The length of hospital stay was lower for the early invasive group. 

Conclusion: Although we cannot draw a definite conclusion due to the occurrence of events that was lower than expected, the immediate invasive strategy was safe but not superior to the late invasive strategy.

Read article

erik_badings_europcr
Erik Badings, MD, MsC.
2013-05-23

Original title: Early or late intervention in high-risk NSTE-ACS patient: results of the ELISA-3trial. 

More articles by this author

Coronary obstruction registry after TAVI

There is little information in the literature about the obstruction of the coronary ostia after percutaneous aortic valve implantation. 81 TAVI sites and programs...

Clinical results of TAVI in Asia

Since all the studies available in the literature were conducted in North America or Europe, the results of percutaneous aortic valve replacement in Asia...

RIPCORD study: FFR changes clinical consideration of chest pain

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether routine use of FFR in all the coronary arteries could change the strategy in stable...

Coherex Wave Crest: New device for atrial appendage closure

Appendage closure devices have emerged as an alternative to anticoagulation in fibrillated patients with a contraindication for it. The study included 63 patients with...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...