SORT OUT VI: Biolimus eluting stent versus zotarolimus-eluting stent; similar results

Few studies have compared head to head the 2nd generation drug eluting stents. This study randomized 1:1  3671 patients to receive a biolimus eluting stent with biodegradable polymer (1880 patients) versus zotarolimus-eluting stent with biocompatible polymer (1791 patients). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of clinical or angiographic features. Approximately 50% in both groups were experiencing an acute coronary syndrome. At follow-up there were no significant differences in major cardiac events (5.3% to 5.1% for zotarolimus versus biolimus).

Conclusion: Biolimus eluting stent and zotarolimus eluting stent showed similar safety and efficacy.

3_bent_raungaard
Bent Raungaard
2013-10-29

More articles by this author

COREVALVE EXTREME RISK: Promising results with CoreValve in very high-risk patients

Percutaneous aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) recently demonstrated its superiority over medical treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk....

SAFE-PCI for Women: Radial versus femoral access for women

Radial access is associated with a lower rate of vascular and bleeding complications however female patients with smaller diameter arteries such access might be...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Complex PCI: higher ischemic and bleeding risk in contemporary practice

Advances in pharmacological therapies, equipment, and devices have enabled percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to be performed in a growing number of patients with a...

Coil embolization of segmental arteries as a spinal cord protection strategy prior to complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta

Spinal cord ischemia remains one of the most devastating complications in the repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with incidences of up to 20–30% in extensive...

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...