SPRINT: lower blood pressure targets for many hypertensive

Original Title: A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. Presenter: Wright JR Jr.

A systolic blood-pressure target lower than 120 over the standard 140 mm Hg reduces adverse events rates in non-diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk, according to the SPRINT trial, but only at the expense of increased adverse events that include hypotension, syncope, electrolyte abnormalities and kidney injury or acute kidney failure.

The SPRINT trial, carried out in 102 centers across US, included 9,361 > 50 year oldpatients (mean agewas 68 years) with 130 to 180 mm Hg systolic blood pressure (mean 139.7 mm Hg) and high cardiovascular risk. Diabetics and patients with a history of stroke were excluded. The mean number of blood-pressure medications at baseline was 1.8, in both the intensive treatment group and the standard treatment group.

After one year, mean systolic blood pressure was 121.4 mm Hg in the intensive treatment group and 136.2 mm Hg in the standard treatment group; similar values were observed during the whole follow up period. The mean number of blood-pressure medications was 2.8 and 1.8, respectively.

There was a 25% reduction of relative risk and an absolute risk reduction of nearly 0.5% in the combined end point with the lowest blood pressure target.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...