Bleeding Events after Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Long Term Warfarin

Original Title: Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience. Reference: Matthew J. Price et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015. Online before print.

The aim of this trial was to compare the relative risk of major bleeding after left atrial appendage closure vs. long term warfarin treatment.

Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative to chronic anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolisms in patients with atrial fibrillation.

This analysis included two randomized studies that had assessed the WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) to close the left atrial appendage vs. long term warfarin.

A total 1114 patients were included, with a median follow up of 3.1 years. The overall major bleeding rate at the end of follow up was similar in both groups (3.5 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.40; p = 0.84).

The left atrial appendage closure significantly reduces bleeding after seven days post randomization (1.8 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.75; p = 0.001), which is even more notable after six months (1.0 events vs. 3.5 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.49; p < 0.001) when patients assigned to the left atrial appendage closure discontinue anticoagulation and antiplatelet medication.

This reduction in bleeding was consistent across all patient subgroups.

Conclusion
There were no differences in global bleeding rate between patients assigned to left atrial appendage closure compared to patients receiving warfarin over a 3 year period.

However, the left atrial appendage closure reduces bleeding only after the periprocedural period and particularly after six months, when adjunctive anticoagulation and antiplatelets are discontinued.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...