Bleeding Events after Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Long Term Warfarin

Original Title: Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience. Reference: Matthew J. Price et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015. Online before print.

The aim of this trial was to compare the relative risk of major bleeding after left atrial appendage closure vs. long term warfarin treatment.

Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative to chronic anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolisms in patients with atrial fibrillation.

This analysis included two randomized studies that had assessed the WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) to close the left atrial appendage vs. long term warfarin.

A total 1114 patients were included, with a median follow up of 3.1 years. The overall major bleeding rate at the end of follow up was similar in both groups (3.5 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.40; p = 0.84).

The left atrial appendage closure significantly reduces bleeding after seven days post randomization (1.8 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.75; p = 0.001), which is even more notable after six months (1.0 events vs. 3.5 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.49; p < 0.001) when patients assigned to the left atrial appendage closure discontinue anticoagulation and antiplatelet medication.

This reduction in bleeding was consistent across all patient subgroups.

Conclusion
There were no differences in global bleeding rate between patients assigned to left atrial appendage closure compared to patients receiving warfarin over a 3 year period.

However, the left atrial appendage closure reduces bleeding only after the periprocedural period and particularly after six months, when adjunctive anticoagulation and antiplatelets are discontinued.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

TAVR in Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation: Are Dedicated Devices Truly Superior?

This systematic meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with pure native aortic regurgitation. The emergence of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...