Bleeding Events after Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Long Term Warfarin

Original Title: Bleeding Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Compared With Long-Term Warfarin A Pooled, Patient-Level Analysis of the WATCHMAN Randomized Trial Experience. Reference: Matthew J. Price et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015. Online before print.

The aim of this trial was to compare the relative risk of major bleeding after left atrial appendage closure vs. long term warfarin treatment.

Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative to chronic anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolisms in patients with atrial fibrillation.

This analysis included two randomized studies that had assessed the WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) to close the left atrial appendage vs. long term warfarin.

A total 1114 patients were included, with a median follow up of 3.1 years. The overall major bleeding rate at the end of follow up was similar in both groups (3.5 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.40; p = 0.84).

The left atrial appendage closure significantly reduces bleeding after seven days post randomization (1.8 events vs. 3.6 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.75; p = 0.001), which is even more notable after six months (1.0 events vs. 3.5 events per 100 patients/year; RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.49; p < 0.001) when patients assigned to the left atrial appendage closure discontinue anticoagulation and antiplatelet medication.

This reduction in bleeding was consistent across all patient subgroups.

Conclusion
There were no differences in global bleeding rate between patients assigned to left atrial appendage closure compared to patients receiving warfarin over a 3 year period.

However, the left atrial appendage closure reduces bleeding only after the periprocedural period and particularly after six months, when adjunctive anticoagulation and antiplatelets are discontinued.

More articles by this author

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...