Conservative Management of MI risk in ACS

Original Title: Spontaneous MI after Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed without Revascularization. The TRILOGY ACS Trial. Reference: Renato D. Lopes et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(11):1289-1297.

 

Patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and especially those managed conservatively without revascularization, are at high risk of a new spontaneous infarction. However, MI risk rate and predictors are unknown.

This study seeks to characterize spontaneous MI rate at 30 days in the TRILOGY ACS population admitted with non ST elevation ACS (TaRgeted platelet Inhibition to cLarify the Optimal strateGy to medically manage Acute Coronary Syndromes) that randomized patients to aspirin and clopidogrel vs. aspirin and prasugrel.

The study included 9294 patients with NSTEMI and unstable angina medically managed without revascularization.

A Cox risk model was used to determine MI predictors at 30 months and after model validation, researchers developed a calculator for model implementation.

Among the 9294 patients managed without revascularization strategy, there were 695 spontaneous infarctions over a median 17 months representing 94% of infarctions adjudicated in the study.

The strongest MI risk predictors were older age, NSTEMI vs. unstable angina as index event, diabetes, absence of angiography prior randomization and elevated creatinine values. The model had good discriminating capabilities and good calibration (c-index = 0.732), especially for patients with low and moderate risk of spontaneous MI.

Conclusion
Spontaneous ACS after medical management is frequent. Baseline statistics can be used to predict risk in this population. These findings provide information on the long term natural evolution of patients medically managed without revascularization.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....