Conservative Management of MI risk in ACS

Original Title: Spontaneous MI after Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Managed without Revascularization. The TRILOGY ACS Trial. Reference: Renato D. Lopes et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(11):1289-1297.

 

Patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and especially those managed conservatively without revascularization, are at high risk of a new spontaneous infarction. However, MI risk rate and predictors are unknown.

This study seeks to characterize spontaneous MI rate at 30 days in the TRILOGY ACS population admitted with non ST elevation ACS (TaRgeted platelet Inhibition to cLarify the Optimal strateGy to medically manage Acute Coronary Syndromes) that randomized patients to aspirin and clopidogrel vs. aspirin and prasugrel.

The study included 9294 patients with NSTEMI and unstable angina medically managed without revascularization.

A Cox risk model was used to determine MI predictors at 30 months and after model validation, researchers developed a calculator for model implementation.

Among the 9294 patients managed without revascularization strategy, there were 695 spontaneous infarctions over a median 17 months representing 94% of infarctions adjudicated in the study.

The strongest MI risk predictors were older age, NSTEMI vs. unstable angina as index event, diabetes, absence of angiography prior randomization and elevated creatinine values. The model had good discriminating capabilities and good calibration (c-index = 0.732), especially for patients with low and moderate risk of spontaneous MI.

Conclusion
Spontaneous ACS after medical management is frequent. Baseline statistics can be used to predict risk in this population. These findings provide information on the long term natural evolution of patients medically managed without revascularization.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...