SAPIEN 3: Low One-Year-Mortality in High Risk or Inoperable Patients

sapien3In the first PARTNER trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves), mortality at one year was 24% for high risk patients and 31% for inoperable patients. A recent report on SAPIEN 3 outcomes at 30 days ─ the last generation balloon expandable valve ─ showed a rather lower adverse events rate. However, additional information at longer term was required.

 

Between October 2013 and September 2014, 583 patients ─ 65% high risk and 35% inoperable ─ were treated with the new device via femoral access site (84%) or transapical/trans-aortic (16%) access site.

 

Population mean age was 83, with 8.4% STS score.

 

One year survival rate was 87.3% for the high risk group and 82.3% for the inoperable group.

 

There were no cases of severe paravalvular leak and those with moderate leaking (2.7%) showed higher mortality rate at one year. Low paravalvular leak had no significant association with mortality.

 

At multivariable analyzis, one year mortality predictors were:

  • Vascular access site other than femoral
  • STS score
  • Disabling stroke

 

Conclusion

This large study on the SAPIEN 3 valve in high risk or inoperable patients showed a very low complications rate that resulted in reduced mortality at one year.

 

Between days 30 and 365, paravalvular leak rate did not increase and there was no association between low paravalvular leak and mortality.

 

Original Title: One-Year Clinical Outcomes with SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Reference: Howard C. Herrmann et al. Circulation. 2016;134:130–140.

 

We value your opinion. Feel free to leave your thoughts, comments, questions or suggestions here below. They will be more than welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...