SAPIEN 3: Low One-Year-Mortality in High Risk or Inoperable Patients

sapien3In the first PARTNER trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves), mortality at one year was 24% for high risk patients and 31% for inoperable patients. A recent report on SAPIEN 3 outcomes at 30 days ─ the last generation balloon expandable valve ─ showed a rather lower adverse events rate. However, additional information at longer term was required.

 

Between October 2013 and September 2014, 583 patients ─ 65% high risk and 35% inoperable ─ were treated with the new device via femoral access site (84%) or transapical/trans-aortic (16%) access site.

 

Population mean age was 83, with 8.4% STS score.

 

One year survival rate was 87.3% for the high risk group and 82.3% for the inoperable group.

 

There were no cases of severe paravalvular leak and those with moderate leaking (2.7%) showed higher mortality rate at one year. Low paravalvular leak had no significant association with mortality.

 

At multivariable analyzis, one year mortality predictors were:

  • Vascular access site other than femoral
  • STS score
  • Disabling stroke

 

Conclusion

This large study on the SAPIEN 3 valve in high risk or inoperable patients showed a very low complications rate that resulted in reduced mortality at one year.

 

Between days 30 and 365, paravalvular leak rate did not increase and there was no association between low paravalvular leak and mortality.

 

Original Title: One-Year Clinical Outcomes with SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Reference: Howard C. Herrmann et al. Circulation. 2016;134:130–140.

 

We value your opinion. Feel free to leave your thoughts, comments, questions or suggestions here below. They will be more than welcome.

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...