Ticagrelor: Similar to Aspirin in Patients with Stroke or TIA

ticagrelorTicagrelor might be a more effective antiplatelet therapy than aspirin for the prevention of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events in patients admitted for acute cerebral ischemia.

 

This double-blind, controlled trial randomized 13,199 patients from 33 countries. Subjects presented a non-severe stroke or a high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA) (not considered as cardioembolic) and had not received intravenous or intraarterial thrombolysis.

 

Patients received either ticagrelor (a 180 mg loading dose followed by 90 mg twice daily) or aspirin (a 300 mg loading dose followed by 100 mg daily). The primary endpoint was the time to the occurrence of the following:

  • Stroke.
  • Acute myocardial infarction.
  • Death within 90 days.

 

During the 90 days of treatment, primary endpoint events occurred as follows:

In the ticagrelor group: 6.7%

In the aspirin group: 7.5%

(hazard ratio [HR]: 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 1.01; p = 0.07).

 

Recurrent ischemic strokes occurred as follows:

In the ticagrelor group: 5.8%

In the aspirin group: 6.7%

 

(HR: 0.87; IC 95%: 0.76 to 1.00).

 

Major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and fatal bleeding rates were almost identical for both drugs.

 

Conclusion

In patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack, ticagrelor was not found to be superior to aspirin in reducing the rate of recurrent stroke, acute myocardial infarction, or death within 90 days after the index event.

 

Original title: Ticagrelor versus Aspirin in Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Reference: S. Claiborne Johnston et al. N Engl J Med 2016;375:35-43.

 

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

 

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....