Carotid PCI at Long Term: Effective in Stroke Prevention?

Carotid PCI stroke preventionThere are no data outside controlled studies, neither are there long term outcomes, on carotid artery stenting. This study was designed to assess the long term effectiveness of carotid stenting to prevent strokes in a large number of real life patients.

 

This registry included prospective data with a strict follow up protocol on 901 patients undergoing carotid stenting between the years 1999 and 2015 in one center.

 

Population mean age was 71±9 years and symptomatic stenosis was found in 262 patients (29.1%).

 

The population also had a high rate of comorbidities. In fact, 289 patients (32.1%) should have been excluded as per CREST protocol (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stent Trial).

 

Median follow up was 5.5 years (range 2.6 – 7.9 years) and it was completed in 93% of patients.

 

Primary end point (combination of death, stroke, acute myocardial infarction) at 30 days plus ipsilateral stroke beyond 30 days was 6.9% (9.9% in symptomatic vs. 5.7% in asymptomatic patients; p=0.03).

 

Events rate resulted higher in patients excluded from the CREST trial compared to those with less comorbidities that could have been included (11.4% vs. 4.9%; p=0.001).

 

Conclusion

Carotid artery stenting is effective at long term to prevent stroke in experienced centers. A high percentage of patients that would have been excluded from randomized studies undergoes carotid stenting in the daily practice. These patients have a significantly higher rate of cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

 

Original Title: Long-Term Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in Clinical Practice.

Reference: Mudra H et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9).

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thought, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

ACVC 2026 | BOX Substudy: Mean Arterial Pressure Targets in Cardiogenic Shock After OHCA

Hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock following ischemic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA-AMICS) remains an unresolved issue, particularly regarding optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...