When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis?

When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy be performed within two weeks of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Because a Swedish registry study showed patients treated within the first days after a transient ischemic attack or stroke are at increased risk of death and perioperatory stroke, this study aims at verifying this risk in another series of patients in Germany.

 

It included 56,336 elective carotid endarterectomies performed in patients with symptomatic stenosis between 2009 and 2014. The overall population was divided in four cohorts according to time interval between index event and surgery.

Cohort 1: 0 to 2 days.

Cohort 2: 3 to 7 days.

Cohort 3: 8 to 14 days.

Cohort 4: 14 to 180 days.

 

Primary end point was stroke or inhospital death. A multilevel multivariable regression model was used for risk adjusted analyzis, given the differences between cohorts.

 

With a mean age of 71.1±9.6 years and 67.5% men, the overall rate of any stroke or death was 2.5% (n=1.434).

 

Risk of any inhospital stroke or death was:

  • 3% for the group intervened within 48 hours of index event
  • 2.5% for the group intervened between days 3 and 7
  • 2.6% for the group intervened between days 7 and 14
  • 2.3% for those intervened between days 14 and 180

 

At multivariable analyzis, the study showed the time of intervention was not significantly associated to events.

 

Even though this study does not assess recurrent events in patients awaiting intervention, but only inhospital events post procedure, we are well aware patients are a high risk of events and, therefore, early intervention is recommended.

 

Historically, early intervention has been resisted by surgeons, because of the supposedly high periprocedural events rate. Mostly, they have tried to “cool the case down”.

 

Conclusion

A shorter time interval between index event and carotid endarterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of peri-procedural events such as death or stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Original Title: Short Time Interval Between Neurologic Event and Carotid Surgery Is Not Associated With an Increased Procedural Risk.

Reference: Pavlos Tsantilas et al. Stroke. 2016 Oct 13. Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...