When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis?

When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy be performed within two weeks of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Because a Swedish registry study showed patients treated within the first days after a transient ischemic attack or stroke are at increased risk of death and perioperatory stroke, this study aims at verifying this risk in another series of patients in Germany.

 

It included 56,336 elective carotid endarterectomies performed in patients with symptomatic stenosis between 2009 and 2014. The overall population was divided in four cohorts according to time interval between index event and surgery.

Cohort 1: 0 to 2 days.

Cohort 2: 3 to 7 days.

Cohort 3: 8 to 14 days.

Cohort 4: 14 to 180 days.

 

Primary end point was stroke or inhospital death. A multilevel multivariable regression model was used for risk adjusted analyzis, given the differences between cohorts.

 

With a mean age of 71.1±9.6 years and 67.5% men, the overall rate of any stroke or death was 2.5% (n=1.434).

 

Risk of any inhospital stroke or death was:

  • 3% for the group intervened within 48 hours of index event
  • 2.5% for the group intervened between days 3 and 7
  • 2.6% for the group intervened between days 7 and 14
  • 2.3% for those intervened between days 14 and 180

 

At multivariable analyzis, the study showed the time of intervention was not significantly associated to events.

 

Even though this study does not assess recurrent events in patients awaiting intervention, but only inhospital events post procedure, we are well aware patients are a high risk of events and, therefore, early intervention is recommended.

 

Historically, early intervention has been resisted by surgeons, because of the supposedly high periprocedural events rate. Mostly, they have tried to “cool the case down”.

 

Conclusion

A shorter time interval between index event and carotid endarterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of peri-procedural events such as death or stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Original Title: Short Time Interval Between Neurologic Event and Carotid Surgery Is Not Associated With an Increased Procedural Risk.

Reference: Pavlos Tsantilas et al. Stroke. 2016 Oct 13. Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is upper-limb aerobic training an effective alternative to lower-limb exercise in peripheral artery disease?

Peripheral artery disease is associated with impaired functional capacity, reduced walking distance, and poorer quality of life, and structured exercise is a class I...

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...