When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis?

When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy be performed within two weeks of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Because a Swedish registry study showed patients treated within the first days after a transient ischemic attack or stroke are at increased risk of death and perioperatory stroke, this study aims at verifying this risk in another series of patients in Germany.

 

It included 56,336 elective carotid endarterectomies performed in patients with symptomatic stenosis between 2009 and 2014. The overall population was divided in four cohorts according to time interval between index event and surgery.

Cohort 1: 0 to 2 days.

Cohort 2: 3 to 7 days.

Cohort 3: 8 to 14 days.

Cohort 4: 14 to 180 days.

 

Primary end point was stroke or inhospital death. A multilevel multivariable regression model was used for risk adjusted analyzis, given the differences between cohorts.

 

With a mean age of 71.1±9.6 years and 67.5% men, the overall rate of any stroke or death was 2.5% (n=1.434).

 

Risk of any inhospital stroke or death was:

  • 3% for the group intervened within 48 hours of index event
  • 2.5% for the group intervened between days 3 and 7
  • 2.6% for the group intervened between days 7 and 14
  • 2.3% for those intervened between days 14 and 180

 

At multivariable analyzis, the study showed the time of intervention was not significantly associated to events.

 

Even though this study does not assess recurrent events in patients awaiting intervention, but only inhospital events post procedure, we are well aware patients are a high risk of events and, therefore, early intervention is recommended.

 

Historically, early intervention has been resisted by surgeons, because of the supposedly high periprocedural events rate. Mostly, they have tried to “cool the case down”.

 

Conclusion

A shorter time interval between index event and carotid endarterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of peri-procedural events such as death or stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Original Title: Short Time Interval Between Neurologic Event and Carotid Surgery Is Not Associated With an Increased Procedural Risk.

Reference: Pavlos Tsantilas et al. Stroke. 2016 Oct 13. Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | HI-PEITHO: Catheter-directed strategy (EKOS) in intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism

The treatment of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) continues to be an area of therapeutic uncertainty. The initial PEITHO study (2014) demonstrated a reduction in...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...