Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis?

When to Intervene a Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Guidelines recommend that carotid endarterectomy be performed within two weeks of stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Because a Swedish registry study showed patients treated within the first days after a transient ischemic attack or stroke are at increased risk of death and perioperatory stroke, this study aims at verifying this risk in another series of patients in Germany.

 

It included 56,336 elective carotid endarterectomies performed in patients with symptomatic stenosis between 2009 and 2014. The overall population was divided in four cohorts according to time interval between index event and surgery.

Cohort 1: 0 to 2 days.

Cohort 2: 3 to 7 days.

Cohort 3: 8 to 14 days.

Cohort 4: 14 to 180 days.

 

Primary end point was stroke or inhospital death. A multilevel multivariable regression model was used for risk adjusted analyzis, given the differences between cohorts.

 

With a mean age of 71.1±9.6 years and 67.5% men, the overall rate of any stroke or death was 2.5% (n=1.434).

 

Risk of any inhospital stroke or death was:

  • 3% for the group intervened within 48 hours of index event
  • 2.5% for the group intervened between days 3 and 7
  • 2.6% for the group intervened between days 7 and 14
  • 2.3% for those intervened between days 14 and 180

 

At multivariable analyzis, the study showed the time of intervention was not significantly associated to events.

 

Even though this study does not assess recurrent events in patients awaiting intervention, but only inhospital events post procedure, we are well aware patients are a high risk of events and, therefore, early intervention is recommended.

 

Historically, early intervention has been resisted by surgeons, because of the supposedly high periprocedural events rate. Mostly, they have tried to “cool the case down”.

 

Conclusion

A shorter time interval between index event and carotid endarterectomy was not associated with an increased risk of peri-procedural events such as death or stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

 

Original Title: Short Time Interval Between Neurologic Event and Carotid Surgery Is Not Associated With an Increased Procedural Risk.

Reference: Pavlos Tsantilas et al. Stroke. 2016 Oct 13. Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

C-TRACT: Endovascular therapy in post-thrombotic syndrome due to iliac obstruction

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is one of the most limiting sequelae following proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It clinically manifests as chronic pain, edema, skin...

Coil embolization of segmental arteries as a spinal cord protection strategy prior to complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta

Spinal cord ischemia remains one of the most devastating complications in the repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with incidences of up to 20–30% in extensive...

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...