TAVR in Pure Aortic Regurgitation Is Associated with Lower Mortality Rates

TAVR in Pure Aortic Regurgitation mortalityThis study summarizes all available evidence on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the treatment of native pure aortic regurgitation.

 

Surgical replacement is the standard of care for pure aortic regurgitation. However, there are many reports of cases and small studies in which high-risk patients with pure aortic regurgitation were treated with TAVR.

 

Authors systematically searched for works reporting at least 5 patients with pure aortic regurgitation who received TAVR. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

 

The analysis included 13 works, which amounted a total of 237 patients. Most of them received self-expandable prostheses (79%).

 

Procedural success ranged between 74% and 100%, and 17 patients (7%) required the implantation of a second valve. Conversion to conventional surgery was 2.5%.

 

The rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3% to 13%). There were no cerebrovascular events and major bleeding and vascular complication rates were 2% and 3%, respectively.

 

Permanent pacemaker implantation was required in 11% of patients, a relatively low rate if we take into account that self-expandable prostheses were used in most patients.

 

The rate of moderate to severe procedural aortic regurgitation was 9%.

 

Conclusion

In selected patients with pure aortic regurgitation who were not eligible for conventional surgery due to high risk, transcatheter replacement is feasible and associated with an acceptable short-term mortality rate.

 

Original title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the Treatment of Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation. A Systematic Review.

Reference: Anna Franzone et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016. ONLINE FIRST.

 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....