TAVR in Pure Aortic Regurgitation Is Associated with Lower Mortality Rates

TAVR in Pure Aortic Regurgitation mortalityThis study summarizes all available evidence on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the treatment of native pure aortic regurgitation.

 

Surgical replacement is the standard of care for pure aortic regurgitation. However, there are many reports of cases and small studies in which high-risk patients with pure aortic regurgitation were treated with TAVR.

 

Authors systematically searched for works reporting at least 5 patients with pure aortic regurgitation who received TAVR. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

 

The analysis included 13 works, which amounted a total of 237 patients. Most of them received self-expandable prostheses (79%).

 

Procedural success ranged between 74% and 100%, and 17 patients (7%) required the implantation of a second valve. Conversion to conventional surgery was 2.5%.

 

The rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3% to 13%). There were no cerebrovascular events and major bleeding and vascular complication rates were 2% and 3%, respectively.

 

Permanent pacemaker implantation was required in 11% of patients, a relatively low rate if we take into account that self-expandable prostheses were used in most patients.

 

The rate of moderate to severe procedural aortic regurgitation was 9%.

 

Conclusion

In selected patients with pure aortic regurgitation who were not eligible for conventional surgery due to high risk, transcatheter replacement is feasible and associated with an acceptable short-term mortality rate.

 

Original title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the Treatment of Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation. A Systematic Review.

Reference: Anna Franzone et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016. ONLINE FIRST.

 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...