Edge Restenosis with Everolimus Eluting Stents: a few Predictors

Edge Restenosis with Everolimus Eluting StentsStent edge restenosis continues to be a weakness of drug eluting stents (DES). The aim of this study was to determine its predictors using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

 

The study retrospectively analyzed 319 patients receiving OCT immediately after everolimus eluting stent implantation (EES) looking into the immediate outcome, and follow up angiography at 9 and 12 months.

 

Binary angiographic stent edge restenosis was 10%. OCT more often showed lipidic plaque in patients with stent edge restenosis vs. those without it. (61% vs. 20%; p<0.001), as well as smaller minimal lumen area (4.13±2.61 vs. 5.58±2.46 mm2; p=0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed these two variables are significant predictors of stent edge restenosis.

 

A lipidic arc of 185° (sensitivity: 71%; specificity: 72%; area under the curve: 0.761) and minimal lumen area of 4.10 mm2 (sensitivity: 67%; specificity: 77%; area under the curve: 0.787) were the ideal cutoff values to predict stent edge restenosis.

 

These results do not come as a surprise since it is well known that plaque in the distal or proximal stent edges and stent underexpansion are restenosis predictors.

 

Conclusion

OCT provides decisive information on optimal stent diameter and expansion to select the right stent length, which in turn will allow us to cover the whole plaque.

 

Original Title: Optical Coherence Tomography Predictors for Edge Restenosis after Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.

Reference: Ino Y et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct; 9(10).


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....