TAVR in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Severe Impairment of Systolic Function

TAVR in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic StenosisPatients with low-flow, low-gradient severe symptomatic aortic stenosis associated with severe impairment of the left ventricular systolic function have shown acceptable outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), according to the multicenter TOPAS-TAVI registry, which demonstrated a relatively low 30-day mortality rate.

 

Considering the very high risk presented by this population involved, a 30-day mortality rate of 4.3% and a 1-year mortality rate of 19.6% seem very reasonable.

 

Most patients (50%-70%) with severe aortic stenosis present normal left ventricular systolic function associated with normal flow and low gradient. A lower percentage (10%-25%) has paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient disease with normal systolic function. Finally, there is a minority, 5% to 10%, with classical low-flow, low-gradient disease and severe impairment of the systolic function.

 

This last group has a very high level of risk, and, without treatment, the mortality rate is 50% to 60% at 3 years (which can be higher for patients without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echo).

 

The TOPAS-TAVI registry included 276 patients (from 14 sites) with symptomatic aortic stenosis associated with an ejection fraction of 40% or lower, an aortic valve area of 1 cm2 or smaller, and a mean gradient less than 35 mm Hg.

 

The average EuroSCORE 2 was 13% and the STS PROM score was 10.3%, a risk comparable to that for inoperable patients included in the PARTNER 1 trial.

 

The baseline echocardiogram revealed a mean ejection fraction of 29.9%, a mean gradient of 25.5 mm Hg, and a mean aortic valve area of 0.75 cm2. Of all patients who underwent a dobutamine stress echo, only 45.2% presented contractile reserve, defined as an increase of at least 20% in systolic volume.

 

Most patients received a balloon-expandable valve (Edwards Lifesciences), through a transfemoral approach.

 

At 30 days, the mortality rate was 4.3%, the need for a permanent pacemaker was 4%, the rate of major cardiovascular complications was 4.7%, and the rate of major bleeding was 6.5%.

 

There was no difference in mortality at 1 year between patients with contractile reserve when compared to those without it. A multivariable analysis confirmed that the presence of contractile reserve is not a predictor of any type of event.

 

At 1 year, 70% of the population showed some kind of improvement in the left ventricular systolic function, which could not be predicted by presence or absence of contractile reserve.

 

Original title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Prospective Multicenter TOPAS-TAVI Study.

Reference: Ribeiro HB et al. TCT 2016. Washington, DC.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

*

Top