Infarction in Cariogenic Shock: Prioritizing the Use of Impella Could Improve Survival

Infarction in Cariogenic ShockThis small study suggests the early use of Impella ventricular support device in patients undergoing AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock could help lower mortality rate in this population.

 

However, study design should moderate our enthusiasm, mainly because of the cost of this device.

 

Detroit Cardiogenic Shock Initiative has stressed early identification of cardiogenic shock and Impella implantation, event before primary PCI, to reduce the use of vasopressors and inotropes. This cardiogenic shock early alarm protocol was applied to 37 patients, and had 84% survival rate at discharge. None of these patients required ventricular assist devicies or cardiac transplant.

 

Patients saw better evolution when operators used invasive hemodynamic monitoring, so use of Swan-Ganz monitoring to guide the inotropic therapy, and decide device extraction could be important.

 

Si bien un 84% de sobrevida al alta en el contexto de un infarto en shock cardiogénico es muy impresionante, la falta de un grupo control o de ajuste en ciertas comparaciones limita mucho la fuerza de estos hallazgos, por lo que se deben esperar estudios con más pacientes y con un diseño más estricto para conclusiones más definitivas.

 

Título original: Outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute MI cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with Impella.

Presentador:  O’Neill WW.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...