Infarction in Cariogenic Shock: Prioritizing the Use of Impella Could Improve Survival

Infarction in Cariogenic ShockThis small study suggests the early use of Impella ventricular support device in patients undergoing AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock could help lower mortality rate in this population.

 

However, study design should moderate our enthusiasm, mainly because of the cost of this device.

 

Detroit Cardiogenic Shock Initiative has stressed early identification of cardiogenic shock and Impella implantation, event before primary PCI, to reduce the use of vasopressors and inotropes. This cardiogenic shock early alarm protocol was applied to 37 patients, and had 84% survival rate at discharge. None of these patients required ventricular assist devicies or cardiac transplant.

 

Patients saw better evolution when operators used invasive hemodynamic monitoring, so use of Swan-Ganz monitoring to guide the inotropic therapy, and decide device extraction could be important.

 

Si bien un 84% de sobrevida al alta en el contexto de un infarto en shock cardiogénico es muy impresionante, la falta de un grupo control o de ajuste en ciertas comparaciones limita mucho la fuerza de estos hallazgos, por lo que se deben esperar estudios con más pacientes y con un diseño más estricto para conclusiones más definitivas.

 

Título original: Outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute MI cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with Impella.

Presentador:  O’Neill WW.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...