Infarction in Cariogenic Shock: Prioritizing the Use of Impella Could Improve Survival

Infarction in Cariogenic ShockThis small study suggests the early use of Impella ventricular support device in patients undergoing AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock could help lower mortality rate in this population.

 

However, study design should moderate our enthusiasm, mainly because of the cost of this device.

 

Detroit Cardiogenic Shock Initiative has stressed early identification of cardiogenic shock and Impella implantation, event before primary PCI, to reduce the use of vasopressors and inotropes. This cardiogenic shock early alarm protocol was applied to 37 patients, and had 84% survival rate at discharge. None of these patients required ventricular assist devicies or cardiac transplant.

 

Patients saw better evolution when operators used invasive hemodynamic monitoring, so use of Swan-Ganz monitoring to guide the inotropic therapy, and decide device extraction could be important.

 

Si bien un 84% de sobrevida al alta en el contexto de un infarto en shock cardiogénico es muy impresionante, la falta de un grupo control o de ajuste en ciertas comparaciones limita mucho la fuerza de estos hallazgos, por lo que se deben esperar estudios con más pacientes y con un diseño más estricto para conclusiones más definitivas.

 

Título original: Outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute MI cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with Impella.

Presentador:  O’Neill WW.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...