Mitral Valve Repair with MitraClip Is Safe in High-Risk Patients

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Transcatheter mitral valve repair with MitraClip has shown good results in symptomatic patients with extreme surgical risk in different studies. However, its “real world” benefits have not been studied in depth due to how complex this strategy is compared with other usual procedures.

La reparación de la válvula mitral con Mitraclip es segura en pacientes de alto riesgo

This study analyzed 2952 patients who underwent mitral valve repair with MitraClip and were included in the STS/ACC TVT Registry.


Read also: MitraClip Procedure Can Be Performed without General Anesthesia”.


The mean age was 82 years (over half the patients were male) and patients presented multiple comorbidities. Their functional class was low and half of them were considered fragile. All of them presented high surgical risk (the Society of Thoracic Surgery predicted risk of mortality was 6.1% for mitral repair and 9.2% for mitral replacement).

 

The root cause for mitral regurgitation was degenerative.

 

The most frequent MitraClip implantation site was the A2P2 segment. Patients were implanted with more than one clip in 34% of all cases. As regards mitral regurgitation severity, 61.8%, 31.2%, and 7% of all patients presented ≤1, 2, and ≥3 levels, respectively. Procedural success was 91.8%.


Read also: SOLACI CACI 2017 | How to do a MitraClip simple and fast”.


In-hospital mortality was 2.7%; 4 patients experienced device embolization; major bleeding was 3.9%; stroke was 0.4%; acute myocardial infarction was 0.1%, and the need for surgery was 0.7%.

 

The rates of mortality at 30 days and at 1 year were 5.2% and 25.8%, respectively, and repeat hospitalization for heart failure was 20.2%.

 

The factors associated with mortality or repeat hospitalization for heart failure, after multivariate adjustment, were the following:

  • Old age
  • Low ejection fraction
  • Worse post-procedural mitral regurgitation
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Dialysis
  • Tricuspid regurgitation

 

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate that “real world” transcatheter mitral valve repair was performed in the United States with effectiveness and safety. In that sense, findings may help determine which patients have favorable long-term outcomes with this therapy.

 

Editorial Comment

This “real world” analysis shows that this strategy is feasible and safe in extreme- and high-risk patients, and that its 1-year outcomes are defined by the significant comorbidities present.

 

With greater group experience and new devices, this indication will surely be applied to lower-risk populations.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original title: Outcomes with Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in the United States. An STS/ACC TVT Registry Report.

Reference: Paul Sorajja, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2315-27.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...