New Anticoagulant Agents in Atrial Fibrillation in Latin American Patients, Specifically

There is limited information on the use of antithrombotic therapies and their outcomes in Latin American patients with atrial fibrillation. This stands true in almost all aspects of medicine: large multicenter randomized studies rarely include Latin American countries, and when they do, the population included is not representative of the overall population.

pacientes anticoagulados por fibrilación auricular que reciben angioplastia tratamientoThe only exception are endemic diseases; for example, with the rise of the Zika virus, NEJM was filled with articles authored in Brazil. However, for all other medicine-related issues, most times we have to make do with data extrapolation.

 

The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 48) global study compared the efficacy and safety of edoxaban vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation over a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. Authors compared the results of both drugs in 2661 Latin American patients vs. 18,444 patients from other regions.


Read also: Cost-Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure and the New Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation.


Upon comparison of patients from Latin America and other regions, the overall risks for stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding were similar. However, Latin American patients experienced higher mortality rates and higher risk of intracranial bleeding.

 

When compared with warfarin, edoxaban reduced the risk of stroke/systemic embolism in patients from all regions (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.64 and 0.91 for Latin America and other regions, respectively), and it also reduced the risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.71 and 0.82, respectively), and cardiovascular death (HR: 0.78 and 0.88, respectively). There was no evidence of heterogeneity among regions.


Read also: TCT 2018 | OAC-ALONE: Anticoagulation Alone 1 Year After Stenting in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.


On the other hand, there was greater reduction of hemorrhagic stroke with edoxaban in Latin America (HR: 0.16) compared with all other regions (HR: 0.64; p for interaction = 0.037).

 

Conclusion

Latin American patients with atrial fibrillation have higher risk of intracranial bleeding and death compared with patients from other regions. However, although event rates were higher for Latin American patients, outcomes with edoxaban vs. warfarin were at least as favorable in them as in patients from the rest of the world, with an even greater reduction in hemorrhagic stroke in Latin American patients. Edoxaban presents an appealing alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation for the prevention of morbidity and mortality related with arterial thromboembolism and anticoagulant agent-related bleeding.

 

Original title: Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Latin American Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial.

Reference: Ramón Corbalán et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:1466-75.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...

TAVR and Anticoagulation: What Should We Do?

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has consolidated as a valid strategy for certain groups of patients. However, approximately one third of those who require...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...