AHA 2018 | New Dyslipidemia Guidelines Support Non-Statin Therapy and Coronary Artery Calcium Screening

While the guidelines do not recommend a specific treatment target, they suggest additional therapy in high-risk patients with LDL 70 mg/dL or higher.

Las nuevas guías de dislipemia apoyan la terapia sin estatinas y la búsqueda de calcio coronarioThese new guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) start recommending ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibition in select high-risk patients and proposing noninvasive coronary artery calcium screening with computerized tomography to help make decisions about patients who fall into the gray zone.

 

These new guidelines, presented at the American Heart Association (AHA) Congress (and published simultaneously in Circulation), took 18 months and feature 72 recommendations, including 29 that are class I. Similarly to all guidelines, they recommend a healthy lifestyle for all age groups.


Read also: Highlights from TCT 2018.


High cholesterol is both preventable and treatable, and these guidelines will give clinicians the tools they need to converse with patients and come up with individually-tailored treatment.

 

These guidelines emphasize that having high cholesterol at any age significantly increases cardiovascular risk, recommending early risk assessment, even among children and young adults.

 

In a secondary prevention setting, there is now a class I indication for reducing LDL levels by 50% or more with a high-intensity statin (atorvastatin 40-80 mg or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg), or the maximally tolerated dose in all patients with evidence of cardiovascular disease.


Read also: Highlights from ESC 2018.


For very-high-risk patients (multiple cardiovascular events and risk factors) and those with LDL ≥70 mg/dL, the guidelines recommend adding ezetimibe to the maximally tolerated statin dose (class IIa). If LDL still remains ≥ 70 mg/dL, a PCSK9 inhibitor such as alirocumab or evolocumab (class IIa) could be added. However, guidelines state that the long-term safety of these monoclonal antibodies is unknown.

 

In patients with primary hypercholesterolemia who have LDL levels ≥190 mg/dL, physicians should start a high-intensity statin treatment regardless of the risk at 10 years.

 

For diabetic patients from 40 to 75 years old, the guidelines recommend a moderate-intensity statin treatment regardless of the risk at 10 years (class I). If a diabetic patient has other risk factors or is ≥50 years old, an intensive treatment (class IIa) can be considered.

 

A significant change from previous guidelines is that current ones recommend monitoring patients 4 to 12 weeks after starting therapy to assess its effect and, then, continued monitoring every 3 to 12 months thereafter.

 

Original title: 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guidelines on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Reference: Grundy SM et al. Circulation. 2018; Epub ahead of print.

 

Nuevas-guias-Dislipemia


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...