TAVR Is Feasible and Offers Good Outcomes in Patients with Cancer

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Oncology patients have been excluded from all studies, but many of them have a life expectancy of over a year or two, and aortic stenosis can pose a problem as regards their treatment.

¿Se debe tener en cuenta el género para revascularizar el tronco?This study analyzed 2744 patients who underwent TAVR. Among them, 222 presented cancer (8.1%).

 

Patients with cancer were younger, more fragile, had lower serum albumin levels, experienced less cardiovascular events, and had lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] mortality scores.

 

The most frequent cancer type was gastrointestinal cancer, followed by prostate, breast, hematologic, and lung cancers.


Read also: Percutaneous Closure Systems Are Safe in TAVR and Aneurysms.


Transfemoral access was more used in patients without cancer. There were no differences between cohorts as regards procedure-related complications, except for higher bleeding rates among patients with cancer.

 

Although 30-day mortality was similar, 1-year mortality was higher in cancer patients (15% vs. 9%; p < 0.001). One half of the deaths were related to the progression of cancer. This was, in turn, strongly linked to stage III-IV patients (hazard ratio: 2.37; 95% confidence interval: 1.74 to 3.23; p < 0.001), but not to stage I-II patients.


Read also: Is Individual Operator Experience Important in TAVR?


Among cancer patients who survived one year, one third were in remission/cured.

 

Conclusion

Among cancer patients, TAVR is associated with similar short-term but worse long-term prognosis compared with patients without cancer. In patients with this disease, mortality is higher due to it and to progressive malignancy, which is a strong predictor. It should be noted that 85% of the patients survived one year and one third were in remission/cured from cancer.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Oncology Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Reference: Uri Landes et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019;12:78-86


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...