Long Term Effect of Low Dose Paclitaxel Coated Balloon

The beneficial effect of low dose drug coated balloons with paclitaxel is sustained in time according to this randomized study. In a nutshell, this study has shown a significant statistical difference in favor of paclitaxel coated balloons vs. conventional PCI at 2 years.

Efecto a largo plazo de los balones liberadores con bajas dosis de paclitaxelThe safety and efficacy of new generation low dose drug coated balloons with paclitaxel is owed to its design, meant to optimize the amount of drug transferred to the vessel and maximize time-action ratio.

 

Several randomized studies have shown better patency of drug coated balloons at one year compared against conventional balloons but follow up has been no longer than a year. In addition, the effect of drug coated balloons does not seem to be associated to class and there could be differences between the different devices. First generation drug coated balloons failed to show benefits at two years, casting a shadow over long term efficacy.


Read also: Good Outcomes for MitraClip “Off Label”.


This study randomized 294 patients (3:1) to PCI vs drug coated balloons vs. conventional balloons to the superficial femoral artery.

 

Patency at 2 years was significantly higher with drug coated balloons assessed by Doppler (75.9% vs. 61.0%; p=0.025) and clinically driven revascularization was also lower (12.1% vs. 30.5%; p < 0.001).

 

There were no major amputations in neither of the groups. All-cause mortality rate (6.5% vs. 5.1%; p=1.00) and cardiovascular rate (1.6% vs. 1.7%; p=1.00) resulted practically identical.


Read also: Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon in Femoral: Effective at Long Term?


Functional improvement of baseline symptoms was sustained in both groups, but the drug coated balloon cohort required 60% less reintervention.

 

Conclusion

We can reach a sustained effect with new generation coated balloons with optimized low doses of paclitaxel. This study has shown for the first time that there is a significant difference in primary patency at two years in favor of these new devices.

 

Original title: Sustainable Antirestenosis Effect with a Low-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon. The ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial 2-Year Results.

Reference: Marianne Brodmann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018;11:2357–64.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...