Long Term Effect of Low Dose Paclitaxel Coated Balloon

The beneficial effect of low dose drug coated balloons with paclitaxel is sustained in time according to this randomized study. In a nutshell, this study has shown a significant statistical difference in favor of paclitaxel coated balloons vs. conventional PCI at 2 years.

Efecto a largo plazo de los balones liberadores con bajas dosis de paclitaxelThe safety and efficacy of new generation low dose drug coated balloons with paclitaxel is owed to its design, meant to optimize the amount of drug transferred to the vessel and maximize time-action ratio.

 

Several randomized studies have shown better patency of drug coated balloons at one year compared against conventional balloons but follow up has been no longer than a year. In addition, the effect of drug coated balloons does not seem to be associated to class and there could be differences between the different devices. First generation drug coated balloons failed to show benefits at two years, casting a shadow over long term efficacy.


Read also: Good Outcomes for MitraClip “Off Label”.


This study randomized 294 patients (3:1) to PCI vs drug coated balloons vs. conventional balloons to the superficial femoral artery.

 

Patency at 2 years was significantly higher with drug coated balloons assessed by Doppler (75.9% vs. 61.0%; p=0.025) and clinically driven revascularization was also lower (12.1% vs. 30.5%; p < 0.001).

 

There were no major amputations in neither of the groups. All-cause mortality rate (6.5% vs. 5.1%; p=1.00) and cardiovascular rate (1.6% vs. 1.7%; p=1.00) resulted practically identical.


Read also: Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon in Femoral: Effective at Long Term?


Functional improvement of baseline symptoms was sustained in both groups, but the drug coated balloon cohort required 60% less reintervention.

 

Conclusion

We can reach a sustained effect with new generation coated balloons with optimized low doses of paclitaxel. This study has shown for the first time that there is a significant difference in primary patency at two years in favor of these new devices.

 

Original title: Sustainable Antirestenosis Effect with a Low-Dose Drug-Coated Balloon. The ILLUMENATE European Randomized Clinical Trial 2-Year Results.

Reference: Marianne Brodmann et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018;11:2357–64.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

Safety of Prophylactic Spinal Fluid Drainage in Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Spinal cord injury remains one of the most devastating complications of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, mainly associated to a compromised the Adamkiewicz artery...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....