The Significance of Aetiology on Mitral Regurgitation

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

The aetiology of mitral regurgitation (MR) may be divided into primary, organic or degenerative MR, and secondary or functional MR. These two present different physiopathology. The treatment strategy is different for each, and edge-to-edge treatment with Mitraclip is currently emerging as a valid alternative for high-risk patients.

TAVI en bajo riesgo con “cero” mortalidad y “cero” strokeThis study analyzed 943 patients with MR and high surgical risk. Among them, 668 had functional causes (FMR) and 275 had degenerative causes (DMR).

 

For patients with FMR, the mean age was 72 years, the EuroSCORE II was 7.4, and the ejection fraction was 33%.

 

Three hundred and sixty-five patients received MitraClip, 95 underwent surgery (valve repair, mostly), and the remaining 228 patients received medical treatment.


Read also: TCT 2018 | REDUCE-FMR: Indirect Annuloplasty in Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.


The groups presented differences. Patients who received MitraClip were elderly compared with the group undergoing surgery, but similar in age to the group who received medical treatment. However, their risk score and comorbidities were higher than for the other two groups.

 

In the MitraClip group, procedural success was 97%.

 

Propensity score matching and Cox regression were used to reduce confounding variables among groups.


Read also: TCT 2018 | COAPT: MitraClip in Patients with Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.


After a 3-year follow-up, the medical treatment group presented higher mortality rates than the MitraClip group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34 to 2.39; p < 0.001). On the other hand, there were no differences between the surgery group and the MitraClip group (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.54 to 1.38; p = 0.541).

 

As regards DMR patients, there were no significant differences among strategies.

 

Conclusions

In high-risk FMR patients, MitraClip showed a reduction in mortality compared with medical treatment.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original title: Impact of Mitral Valve Treatment Choice on Mortality According to Aetiology.

Reference: Friso Kortlandt et al. EuroIntervention 2019;14:1733-1739.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...