Valve-in-Valve with Self-Expanding Prosthesis: What Happens with Gradients at One Year?

Degenerated surgical bioprostheses can be safely treated with CoreValve or CoreValve Evolut using the valve-in-valve procedure. Excellent 1-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes were achieved in a non-selected regular population, i.e., “real-world” patients.

valve in valve

The VIVA (Valve in Valve) registry, conducted at 23 sites, was a prospective study designed to systematically collect data from patients with degenerated surgical prostheses who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Researchers enrolled a total of 202 patients with degenerated surgical prostheses who were eligible for elective treatment with CoreValve or CoreValve Evolut R.


Read also: Aspirin in Primary Prevention: Another “Trendy” Topic in Publications.


Mean patient age was 79.9 years old and the risk according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.6%.

Although 41.8% of patients had ≤21-mm surgical bioprostheses, valve hemodynamic parameters markedly improved from baseline (mean baseline valve gradient 35.0 ± 16.3 mmHg vs. 17.5 ± 8.6 mmHg at discharge). At 1 year, aortic regurgitation greater than mild was barely 1.1%.

Clinical events at 30 days demonstrated low mortality (2.5%), no disabling strokes, a 0.5% rate of acute kidney injury, and an 8% rate of permanent pacemaker implantation.

At 1 year, the mortality rate remained low (8.8%), with only 1 disabling stroke during that period (0.6%).


Read also: Pulmonary Hypertension: No Reason for TAVR Contraindication.


About 2.5% of patients (n = 5) experienced coronary artery occlusion as complication (one of the most feared for valve-in-valve); 3 took place during release, 1 immediately after the procedure, and only 1 several months later.

Conclusion

Surgically-implanted valves with bioprosthetic degeneration can be safely treated with the self-expanding device with more evidence in the market, which has excellent 1-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in this real-world non-selected population.

Orginal Title: TAVR for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using aSelf-Expanding Device 1-Year Results From the Prospective VIVA Postmarket Study.

Reference: Didier Tchétché et al.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...