Vena Cava Filter for All Patients After Severe Trauma

Until today, there was no evidence warranting the early implantation of a vena cava filter for the reduction of the risk of pulmonary embolism in patients with severe trauma and contraindication to prophylactic anticoagulation.

This article, soon to be published in the New England Medical Journal (NEJM), brings us such evidence and we surrender to it. Early prophylactic placement of a vena cava filter after severe trauma did not reduce the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or death at 90 days compared with no implantation of a filter.

This multicenter controlled trial enrolled 240 patients with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score >15; scores range from 0 to 75, and the highest the score, the highest the severity]) who had a contraindication to anticoagulation, and randomized them to filter implantation within the first 72 hours after admission vs. no implantation.


Read also: New Promising Alternatives for Mitral Regurgitation.


The primary endpoint was a composite of symptomatic pulmonary embolism at 8 to 90 days in the subgroup of patients who survived at least 7 days and who did not receive prophylactic anticoagulation during that time.

The mean age was 39 years old and the mean Injury Severity Score was 27.

Early filter implantation did not result in lower incidence of the primary endpoint (13.9% in the vena cava filter group vs. 14.4% in the control group; p = 0.98).

No patient in the filter group developed pulmonary embolism while 5 patients (14.7%) in the control group, including one who died, did experience such complication. Entrapped thrombus was found in the filter in 6 patients.

Conclusion

Early prophylactic placement of a vena cava filter in patients with severe trauma did not result in a lower incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or death at 90 days vs. no filter implantation in patients with contraindication to prophylactic anticoagulation.

Original Title: A Multicenter Trial of Vena Cava Filters in Severely Injured Patients.

Reference: Kwok M. Ho et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 7. [Epub ahead of print].


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

Safety of Prophylactic Spinal Fluid Drainage in Open and Endovascular Repair of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Spinal cord injury remains one of the most devastating complications of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, mainly associated to a compromised the Adamkiewicz artery...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....