ESC 2019 | New European Guidelines on “Chronic Coronary Syndromes”

In Paris, during the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2019 Scientific Sessions, new guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary syndromes were presented. This document, simultaneously published in Euro Heart J, updates the 2013 guidelines on stable ischemic heart disease and takes out the word “stable” so as to emphasize that the disease is anything but that.

Mann mit Herzinfarkt drückt seine Hände an die Brust

Ischemic heart disease can have long stable periods, but it can become unstable at any time. This is typically due to plaque rupture or erosion.

This terminological change was in part to remind us that this disease requires different approaches depending on the time. There are more stable phases and less stable phases, but, in most cases, the disease advances. The point is to intervene on the disease to prevent such advancement and, consequently, events.

These guidelines focus on the most common scenarios: patients with angina and suspected coronary artery disease; asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with stabilized symptoms less than one year after an initial diagnosis or revascularization; patients with angina and suspected vasospastic or microvascular disease; asymptomatic patients in whom coronary artery disease is detected at a preventive checkup, and patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease.


Read also: ESC 2019 | COMPLETE: Definitive Evidence for Infarction with Multivessel Disease.


One of the key aspects of the new guidelines that they acknowledge that the pretest probability of disease in patients presenting with chest pain is dramatically reduced compared to 2013 numbers.

Invasive tests are recommended in patients at high probability of coronary artery disease, while functional tests are recommended in patients at moderate probability. For the growing proportion of patients in whom coronary artery disease seems unlikely, computerized tomography (CT) is recommended.

Another new recommendation in the 2019 guidelines is the addition of a second antithrombotic drug to aspirin, particularly for primary prevention in patients at high risk of ischemic events and low risk for bleeding.

In patients with coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation or another indication for anticoagulation, direct oral anticoagulants are now recommended over vitamin-K antagonists.


Read also: ESC 2019 | ISAR-REACT 5 | Which Is Better in ACS, Prasugrel or Ticagrelor?


As regards revascularization, more evidence has arisen on the usefulness of invasive functional assessments (FFR or iFR), where angioplasty can improve symptoms and also reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction.

Lastly, following the trend of all other recently published documents, writers emphasized the importance of lifestyle modifications, pollution exposure, and other primary prevention measures that were mentioned briefly in the 2013 version.

Guias-sindromes-coronarios-cronicos-articulo-original

Original title: 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The task force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology.

Reference: Knuuti J et al. Euro Heart J. 2019; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...