Revascularization in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Causing ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is an increasing cause of acute myocardial infarction, particularly in younger women. These infarctions are frequently treated conservatively given the risks entailed by revascularization, due to the possibility of causing an antegrade or retrograde expansion of the dissection.

Disección coronaria en mujeres: poco frecuente y de difícil manejo

The uncertainty around treatment for these patients gave way to this study (recently published in J Am Coll Cardiol) comparing different strategies in a setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and comparing its outcomes with those of infarction caused by atherosclerosis.

The study registered all cases of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction between 2003 and 2017, conducting a 3-year follow-up.

Among 5208 patients admitted with infarction, in 1% of cases the cause was spontaneous coronary artery dissection. There was an absolute majority (93%) of female patients in this subgroup. Prevalence goes from 1% to almost 20% if we only consider women younger than 50 years old.


Read also: Drug Coated Balloons vs. Drug Eluting Stents in Primary PCI.


Other than being more frequent in young women, compared with cases of atherosclerosis infarction, infarction due to dissection also came along cardiogenic shock much more frequently (19% vs. 9%; p < 0.03).

The culprit artery was more commonly left main (13% vs. 1% in patients with atherosclerosis; p = 0.003) or left anterior descending (47% vs. 38%; p = 0.003).

Despite including young patients whose culprit artery was the left main, and who had more frequent cardiogenic shock, the revascularization rate among the spontaneous dissection group was significantly lower than among patients with “conventional” infarction (70% vs. 97%; p < 0.0001).

Revascularization most frequently included primary angioplasty, while a low percentage of patients underwent surgery. Procedural success was 91% for primary angioplasty.


Read also: DK CRUSH Is Still The Best Option.


As expected, the patients revascularized were those in worst condition (left main coronary artery involvement, cardiogenic shock, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow grade 0 to 1).

Despite all of that, the 3-year survival for these patients was better than for patients with “common” infarction (98% vs. 84%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection account for a significant subset, usually involving young women, with left main or left anterior descending culprit artery leading to higher rates of cardiogenic shock than in cases of infarction due to atherosclerosis. Primary angioplasty has a high rate of success among these patients, and the 3-year survival among them is considerably higher than for patients with “common” infarction.

Original Title: Revascularization in Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Reference: Angie S. Lobo et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1290–300.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Valve: Outcomes at 3 Years

Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is a common condition in patients who have undergone surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot or other pathologies involving the right...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...