TAVR in Bicuspid Has the Same Results in Surgery at Hospital Level

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Bicuspid aortic stenosis patients (bicuspid AS) represent a small group and have not been included in the larger transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) studies, since they present different morphology and asymmetric calcification, which might come along with more paravalvular leak and less accurate positioning.

El reemplazo transcatéter en válvulas bicúspides suma evidencia pero continúan los desafíos

Between 2012 and 2016, 475,315 patients undergoing TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) were included in the National Inpatient Sample database. 31.895 of these patients presented bicuspid aortic stenosis and 1055 (10.4%) received TAVR; the rest received SAVR.

Those undergoing TAVR were older, more often were women, diabetic, hypertensive and more often presented cardiac failure, kidney function deterioration, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Therefore, a propensity score match was carried out, leaving 975 patients in each group.


Read also: Revascularization in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Causing ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction


In-hospital mortality was 3.1% in both groups. In addition, there were no differences between the strategies as regards cardiorespiratory arrest, cardiogenic shock, kidney function deterioration, stroke and the need for ventricular assistance. However, TAVR was associated to lower acute myocardial infarction rate (1% vs. 3.1% p=0.002), bleeding (23.6% vs. 44.6% p<0.001), transfusion (7.2% vs. 27.2% p<0.001), vascular complications (0.5% vs. 2.6% p<0.001), in-hospital stay (4 days vs. 7 days p<0.01), lower need for discharge to nursing facility (14.4% vs. 17.9% p=0.04) and lower respiratory assistance.

On the other hand, TAVR was associated with higher complete heart block (14.9% vs. 6.2% p<0.001) and need for definite pacemaker (13.8 vs. 4.6% p<0.001).

On the other hand, there were no differences in TAVR between bicuspids and tricuspids.

Conclusion

The National Inpatient Sample database showed similar mortality in severe bicuspid aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVR or SAVR. Besides, TAVR presented similar mortality vs. tricuspid valves. further research is needed to assess long term evolution of TAVR in bicuspid aortic stenosis.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Reference: Ayman Elbadawi, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2019;12:1811–22.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

T-TEER: Beyond Traditional Pulmonary Hypertension Thresholds

Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with progressive functional deterioration, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and increased mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair...

Is left atrial appendage closure safe in patients with reduced ejection fraction?

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from the major randomized trials evaluating percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), and...

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Spain: Sustained Growth and Favorable Real-World Outcomes

Oral anticoagulation remains the standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, many patients have a high bleeding risk or contraindications...

HERA-TAVI: Intra-Annular vs Supra-Annular Valves in TAVI

 The HERA-TAVI study is an international multicenter registry that compared the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of contemporary self-expanding transcatheter heart valves with intra-annular (IA)...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...