Venous Pulmonary Waveforms in MitraClip Have Prognostic Value

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

The MitraClip has been shown to benefit a certain group of patients and it is a well-known fact that a ≥5 mmHg is associated to a more torpid evolution. However, there is little evidence when it comes to venous pulmonary waves, changes in left atrial pressure and V wave.

121 patients with severe mitral regurgitation receiving MitraClip were retrospectively analyzed.

Mean age was 76, over 50% were men, 25% were diabetic, most were in functional class III-IV, 60% had atrial fibrillation and 43% ejection fraction.

The cause was degenerative in 64% of cases.

The number of implanted clips was 1.5, and it brought significant reduction of mitral regurgitation. Mortality was 8% with a low rate of complications.


Read also: Hours of Sleep and Myocardial Infarction Risk.


There was an increase in transmitral gradient (2.1 mmHg to 3.6 mmHg p <0.001) and in addition there was a reduction of left atrial pressure (23 mmHg to 19 mmHg p<0.001) and V wave (43 mmHg vs. 28 mmHg p<0.001). There was also improved S wave velocity after MictraClip.

Survival at 24 months was in favor of patients with improved pulmonary venous waves (85% vs. 40% p<0.001), all-cause mortality, and the composite of all cause death, need of left atrial assistance, reintervention, valve surgery and rehospitalization for cardiac failure.

Conclusion

Pulmonary venous waveforms are an important success marker after percutaneous mitral repair. These data chow that venous pulmonary waveforms might predict rehospitalization and mortality after percutaneous mitral repair. Large multicenter studies are called for to shed light on this matter.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Original Title: Pulmonary Venous Waveforms Predict Rehospitalization and Mortality After Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

Reference: Frank E. Corrigan, et al. JACC Cardiovsc Imag.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.014.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....