Skipping Breakfast and Cardiovascular Risk

Several studies have associated skipping breakfast (having little to no breakfast) with increased cardiometabolic risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. 

Saltearse el desayuno y riesgo cardiovascular

This study examined all the available evidence on the association of skipping breakfast and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

It included 4 studies with close to 200,000 adults (mean age ≥40, 48.5% women) with no known cardiovascular disease at recruiting, followed up for mean 17.4 years.

The general analysis suggests that the population which regularly skips breakfast has 21% higher risk of CAD or cardiac death (HR 1.21, CI 95% 1.08 to 1.35; p=0.304) than those that regularly have breakfast.


Read also: Egg Consumption and Mortality Due to Cardiovascular Events.


Even all cause death risk was 32% higher in patients that skip breakfast (HR 1.32, CI 95% 1.17 to 1.48; p=0.339).

Looking closer, we find that the definition of “no breakfast” was heterogeneous between the studies and that the populations were also different, which might have led to misleading outcomes, regardless adjustments. 

Robust data call for further study at long term with consistent definitions of “no breakfast”. 


Read also: Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Alzheimer Risk.


Meanwhile, it seems reasonable (within the primary prevention scope) to recommend our patients have breakfast, which should the most important meal. 

2020-01-16-jcdd-06-00030

Original Title: Skipping Breakfast and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Death: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies in Primary Prevention Settings.

Reference: Richard Ofori-Asenso et al. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 6 (3) 2019 Aug 22.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....