Skipping Breakfast and Cardiovascular Risk

Several studies have associated skipping breakfast (having little to no breakfast) with increased cardiometabolic risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. 

Saltearse el desayuno y riesgo cardiovascular

This study examined all the available evidence on the association of skipping breakfast and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.

It included 4 studies with close to 200,000 adults (mean age ≥40, 48.5% women) with no known cardiovascular disease at recruiting, followed up for mean 17.4 years.

The general analysis suggests that the population which regularly skips breakfast has 21% higher risk of CAD or cardiac death (HR 1.21, CI 95% 1.08 to 1.35; p=0.304) than those that regularly have breakfast.


Read also: Egg Consumption and Mortality Due to Cardiovascular Events.


Even all cause death risk was 32% higher in patients that skip breakfast (HR 1.32, CI 95% 1.17 to 1.48; p=0.339).

Looking closer, we find that the definition of “no breakfast” was heterogeneous between the studies and that the populations were also different, which might have led to misleading outcomes, regardless adjustments. 

Robust data call for further study at long term with consistent definitions of “no breakfast”. 


Read also: Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Alzheimer Risk.


Meanwhile, it seems reasonable (within the primary prevention scope) to recommend our patients have breakfast, which should the most important meal. 

Loading...

Original Title: Skipping Breakfast and the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Death: A Systematic Review of Prospective Cohort Studies in Primary Prevention Settings.

Reference: Richard Ofori-Asenso et al. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 6 (3) 2019 Aug 22.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Spontaneous Left Main Dissection: Clinical Characteristics, management and Outcomes

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Spontaneous left main dissection in an uncommon, and potentially life-threatening, cause of acute MI. The aim of this study,...

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...