Routine Continuous Monitoring After Angioplasty Might Not Be Necessary

According to a recent study published in Circ. Cardiovasc Interv, after a scheduled angioplasty, the rate of arrhythmia requiring some kind of treatment is very low, low enough to deem unnecessary the routine monitoring of all patients.

Monitoreo Post Angioplastia

The standard policy at many institutions is continuous cardiac monitoring for several hours after undergoing coronary angioplasty, with its subsequent discomfort and monetary costs.

More thorough monitoring of patients who are at risk for arrhythmia seems a reasonable strategy. The at-risk group might include patients with acute coronary syndrome, left main or multivessel disease, hemodynamic instability, and patients with “less than perfect” angioplasty outcomes.

This study included 1278 consecutive procedures between 2015 and 2017. According to hospital policy, all angioplasties were followed by cardiac monitoring for a mean 24 hours. For this analysis, patients were divided in groups depending on whether they experienced arrhythmia requiring treatment or not.


Read also: Reliability of FFR in Patients with Diabetes: Are Other Parameters Necessary?


Overall, there were 1672 arrhythmias during the post-procedure period. Among them, only 37 (2.2%) were actual medically actionable alarms. There were 20 cases of bradyarrhythmia and 17 cases of tachyarrhythmia, with an average of 5.5 hours post-procedure.

Patient factors associated with arrhythmia requiring treatment were acute coronary syndrome, older age, left main disease, and multivessel disease.

Among patients with arrhythmia, 30-day mortality was 6.5% vs. 0.3% for those with no arrhythmia (p < 0.0001).


Read also: New European Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management: What is New?


Additionally, having an arrhythmia alarm activated was associated with permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patient transfer to a coronary unit, and use of class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs.

The results of this work are more hypothesis-generating than definitive. Many physicians might voice some concerns (even of legal nature) about not monitoring patients after angioplasty.

Original Title: Routine continuous electrocardiographic monitoring following percutaneous coronary interventions.

Reference: Al-Hijji MA et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e008290.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...