Routine Continuous Monitoring After Angioplasty Might Not Be Necessary

According to a recent study published in Circ. Cardiovasc Interv, after a scheduled angioplasty, the rate of arrhythmia requiring some kind of treatment is very low, low enough to deem unnecessary the routine monitoring of all patients.

Monitoreo Post Angioplastia

The standard policy at many institutions is continuous cardiac monitoring for several hours after undergoing coronary angioplasty, with its subsequent discomfort and monetary costs.

More thorough monitoring of patients who are at risk for arrhythmia seems a reasonable strategy. The at-risk group might include patients with acute coronary syndrome, left main or multivessel disease, hemodynamic instability, and patients with “less than perfect” angioplasty outcomes.

This study included 1278 consecutive procedures between 2015 and 2017. According to hospital policy, all angioplasties were followed by cardiac monitoring for a mean 24 hours. For this analysis, patients were divided in groups depending on whether they experienced arrhythmia requiring treatment or not.


Read also: Reliability of FFR in Patients with Diabetes: Are Other Parameters Necessary?


Overall, there were 1672 arrhythmias during the post-procedure period. Among them, only 37 (2.2%) were actual medically actionable alarms. There were 20 cases of bradyarrhythmia and 17 cases of tachyarrhythmia, with an average of 5.5 hours post-procedure.

Patient factors associated with arrhythmia requiring treatment were acute coronary syndrome, older age, left main disease, and multivessel disease.

Among patients with arrhythmia, 30-day mortality was 6.5% vs. 0.3% for those with no arrhythmia (p < 0.0001).


Read also: New European Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management: What is New?


Additionally, having an arrhythmia alarm activated was associated with permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patient transfer to a coronary unit, and use of class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs.

The results of this work are more hypothesis-generating than definitive. Many physicians might voice some concerns (even of legal nature) about not monitoring patients after angioplasty.

Original Title: Routine continuous electrocardiographic monitoring following percutaneous coronary interventions.

Reference: Al-Hijji MA et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e008290.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...