Routine Continuous Monitoring After Angioplasty Might Not Be Necessary

According to a recent study published in Circ. Cardiovasc Interv, after a scheduled angioplasty, the rate of arrhythmia requiring some kind of treatment is very low, low enough to deem unnecessary the routine monitoring of all patients.

Monitoreo Post Angioplastia

The standard policy at many institutions is continuous cardiac monitoring for several hours after undergoing coronary angioplasty, with its subsequent discomfort and monetary costs.

More thorough monitoring of patients who are at risk for arrhythmia seems a reasonable strategy. The at-risk group might include patients with acute coronary syndrome, left main or multivessel disease, hemodynamic instability, and patients with “less than perfect” angioplasty outcomes.

This study included 1278 consecutive procedures between 2015 and 2017. According to hospital policy, all angioplasties were followed by cardiac monitoring for a mean 24 hours. For this analysis, patients were divided in groups depending on whether they experienced arrhythmia requiring treatment or not.


Read also: Reliability of FFR in Patients with Diabetes: Are Other Parameters Necessary?


Overall, there were 1672 arrhythmias during the post-procedure period. Among them, only 37 (2.2%) were actual medically actionable alarms. There were 20 cases of bradyarrhythmia and 17 cases of tachyarrhythmia, with an average of 5.5 hours post-procedure.

Patient factors associated with arrhythmia requiring treatment were acute coronary syndrome, older age, left main disease, and multivessel disease.

Among patients with arrhythmia, 30-day mortality was 6.5% vs. 0.3% for those with no arrhythmia (p < 0.0001).


Read also: New European Guidelines for Dyslipidemia Management: What is New?


Additionally, having an arrhythmia alarm activated was associated with permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, patient transfer to a coronary unit, and use of class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs.

The results of this work are more hypothesis-generating than definitive. Many physicians might voice some concerns (even of legal nature) about not monitoring patients after angioplasty.

Original Title: Routine continuous electrocardiographic monitoring following percutaneous coronary interventions.

Reference: Al-Hijji MA et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:e008290.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...