Virtual ACC 2020 | “Dangerous” Plaques by CT Effectively Predict Infarction

This post-hoc analysis of the SCOT-HEART shows low-attenuation plaque burden might successfully predict events. A greater number of low-attenuation plaques seems to be synonymous with greater risk which makes them better predictors than clinical scores, coronary calcification and stenosis degree. 

IVUS, CT and carotid ultrasound are the accepted tools to diagnose plaque burden and predict future events. Calcium scoring might be the paradigm for coronary arteries and is based on logical deduction: the more plaques, the higher the chance of rupture leading to an event. 

But there is a chance we might have been looking at the wrong kind of plaques. In fact, calcified plaques assessed by calcium scoring are the least likely to rupture. What matters is not just the number of plaques, but their nature.

Their composition was what this study looked at, directly measuring the number of low-attenuation plaques, which are considered most dangerous, as they are associated to a large lipidic necrotic core. 


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | Myocardial Ischemia Induced by Sudden Mental Stress.


This study was originally accepted to be presented at the scientific sessions of ACC 2020 together with the World Congress of Cardiology, but the COVI-19 said no to the presentation. However, the information has reached us through Circulation

The SCOT-HEART was a randomized study showing 41% events reduction such as death or infarction at 5 years when using coronary CT angiography instead of the standard treatment (basically a stress test) to manage patients presenting thoracic pain. 

For the current analysis, the authors looked at baseline non-contrast electrocardiogram-gated CT from all SCOT-HEART patients. 


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | Statins Could Also Protect Against Chemotherapy Cardiotoxicity.


Expert observers calculated calcium score as well as obstructive coronary artery disease defined as one or more epicardial vessels with 50% obstruction in the main left or 70% for the rest.

In the 1769 patients followed up at mean 4.7 years, they observed 41 fatal and non-fatal infarctions. Looking at the entire population, low-attenuation plaques correlated well with calcium score, rather badly with cardiovascular risk score and very well with stenosis severity. But when it came to predicting infarction, low-attenuation plaque burden was the most accurate factor. 

Patients with 4% low-attenuation plaque burden, have 5 times higher chances of infarction, be it fatal or not.


Read also: TAVR in Extremely Large Annuli: Different Patients Might Need Different Prostheses.


Future studies such as the PROMISE and the CT CONFIRM will most likely validate this data, as well as the recent ISCHEMIA, where all the population had a CT at baseline. 

 

placas-blandas-por-tac

 

Original Title: Low-attenuation noncalcified plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography predicts myocardial infarction: results from the multicenter SCOT-HEART trial.

Reference: Williams MC et al. Circulation. 2020; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...