Tricuspid valve: Is Percutaneous Intervention Feasible in Patients with Definite Pacemaker?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

As we know, with higher life expectancy comes a significant increase in the use of definite pacemakers, defibrillators and resynchronization devices. Along these lines, the presence of catheters is associated to tricuspid regurgitation, which over time might become severe, leading to cardiac regurgitation and potentially heart failure. 

¿Fin de la discusión sobre el impacto del marcapaso post TAVI?

This group is now being treated with transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI), but little is known about its efficacy.

The study looked at 470 tricuspid regurgitation patients form the TriValve registry undergoing TTVI between January 2015 and December 2018. 121 (25.7%) of these patients presented pacemakers or defibrillators (Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device – CIED) and its evolution was compared against 349 patients with no CIED.

The groups were similar, mean age was 76, they were mostly women, with 36% atrial fibrillation, and EuroScore 10. Patients receiving CIED presented a higher number of hospitalizations, more functional class III-IV, ascites, peripheral edema, COPD, need for diuretics and higher NT pro-BNP. The most frequent cause was functional.


Read also: Plaque Morphology Could Modify Functional Measurements.


In addition, CIED patients presented lower ejection fraction, larger left ventricular diameter and area and higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure. However, effective regurgitant orifice area was smaller. 

In both groups, the device most used was the MitraClip, with 80% procedural success.

In-hospital mortality was 2.9% for the no-CIED and 3.7% for the CIED (p=0.7). 


Read also: The Most Read Scientific Articles of March.


At 30 days, there were no significant differences neither in residual tricuspid regurgitation ≤2+ (70.8 vs. 73.7%) nor in improvement to functional class I-II (66% vs. 65% p=0.3).

Survival at one year was similar (80.7% vs. 73.6% p=0.3).

Conclusion

Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention in patients with definite pacemaker or defibrillators is feasible and has good hospital outcomes which in the short term are comparable to those of patients with no pacemakers or defibrillators. 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Original Title: Outcomes of TTVI in Patients With Pacemaker or Defibrillator Leads Data From the TriValve Registry.

Reference: Maurizio Taramasso, et al. J Am coll Cardiol Intv 2020;13:554-64.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...