MR vs. FFR in Non-Culprit Lesions

Magnetic resonance (MR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) correlate moderately as regards the assessment of non-culprit lesions in patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary angioplasty. For a similar degree of diagnostic accuracy, we would require a visual, semiquantitative, or fully quantitative comprehensive assessment of lesions.

Resonancia vs FFR en lesiones no culpables del infarto

This work, soon to be published in J Am Coll Cardiol Img, looked into the degree of correlation between FFR and MR in the assessment of non-culprit lesions after an infarction.

The study included 77 patients who underwent primary angioplasty and had at least one non-culprit lesion with intermediate stenosis (between 70% and 90%). All patients were assessed through FFR and MR one month after infarction. The MR protocol included stress and rest perfusion, cine imaging, and late gadolinium enhancement. Fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and visual analysis of myocardial perfusion were compared against a reference FFR.


Read also: Predilation in TAVR: Definitive Data for Easier Decision-Making?


Visual analysis through MR displayed an area under the curve of 0.74, with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 70%. The semiquantitative analysis had results similar to those derived from the visual analysis. The MR myocardial blood flow was slightly better than the other parameters, but it still was far from perfect (an area under the curve of 0.82, with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 71%).

Conclusion

Cardiac magnetic resonance and invasive fractional flow reserve have a moderately good correlation as regards non-culprit lesions in patients who suffered from an acute myocardial infarction. All MR parameters yielded a similar diagnostic performance and do not seem enough to replace FFR.

Original Title: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Evaluating Nonculprit Lesions After Myocardial Infarction Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve.

Reference: Henk Everaars et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2020, article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...