In Search of the Optimal Depth for Self-Expandable Valves

Despite the use of the different imaging approaches to calculating implantation depth, optimal depth is reached only 30% of the time. Multiple imaging does not offer a uniform perspective and therefore influence reporting. 

prótesis autoexpandibles

Basically, we do not have a clear idea of what constitutes optimal depth on a case by case basis and, what is worse, even though we knew the exact point, there is little chance of reaching accurate implantation depth. 

Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of 258 patients undergoing TAVR with third generation self-expandable valves were analyzed as to their approach to optimal depth calculation: arithmetic mean, the arithmetic mean of the measured distances from the noncoronary cusp and the left coronary cusp to the distal prosthesis end; noncoronary cusp distance, the distance from the noncoronary cusp to the distal prosthesis end, and the deepest edge of the distal prosthesis end, among others.

Regardless the approach, exact implantation depth was achieved in less than 30% of cases. 


Read also: Valve-in-Valve with Self-Expanding Prosthesis: What Happens with Gradients at One Year?


The deepest edge method is the most precise to differentiate a few relevant outcome parameters, such as the need for permanent pacemaker implantation. 

The hemodynamic outcomes were not affected, regardless success. 

Conclusion

Optimal implantation depth could only be achieved in less than 30% of patients, regardless the approach used to calculate it. In addition, the different approaches do not offer a uniform perspective to calculate the exact implantation depth. 

 

Original title: Navigating the “Optimal Implantation Depth” With a Self-Expandable TAVR Device in Daily Clinical Practice.

Reference: Kerstin Piayda et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2020, article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Valve: Outcomes at 3 Years

Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is a common condition in patients who have undergone surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot or other pathologies involving the right...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...