The FDA Approves Ticagrelor for Primary Prevention in High Risk Patients

The FDA has approved the indication of ticagrelor as primary prevention in high risk CAD patients with no history of MI or stroke. 

La FDA aprueba el ticagrelor en pacientes de alto riesgo como prevención primaria

The lab producing ticagrelor has informed the FDA has based this decision on the THEMIS study, which included nearly 20,000 patients with stable CAD and type 2 diabetes.

This decision has come as a surprise for many, given the delicate balance this study has shown in terms of risk/benefit ratio, let alone the cost of this drug. 

In the THEMIS, ticagrelor significantly reduced the combined end point of major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, MI or stroke) compared against placebo (both arms received aspirin). This difference was significant, but in absolute terms event reduction was lower than 1% (7.7% vs 8.5%; p=0.04).


Read also: ESC 2019 | THEMIS: Ticagrelor in Diabetics with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.


In addition, this event reduction happened at the cost of a two-fold increase in major bleeding (2.2% vs.1.0%; p<0.001) and also intracranial bleeding (0.7% vs. 0.5%; p=0.005).


Read also: ESC 2019 | THEMIS-PCI: Unlike in the Main Study, Here Ticagrelor Is Indeed Effective.


In fact, when the THEMIS was presented last year at the ESC by Deepak Bhatt (one of the authors) it was said that for stable CAD patients with diabetes and no history of MI or stroke, the risk of bleeding counterbalanced the benefit of ticagrelor. 


Read also: THEMIS: Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Events in Delicate Balance for Chronic Ticagrelor.


Original Title: Brilinta approved in the US to reduce the risk of a first heart attack or stroke in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.

Reference: AstraZeneca. Publicado el 01/06/2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...