The FDA Approves Ticagrelor for Primary Prevention in High Risk Patients

The FDA has approved the indication of ticagrelor as primary prevention in high risk CAD patients with no history of MI or stroke. 

La FDA aprueba el ticagrelor en pacientes de alto riesgo como prevención primaria

The lab producing ticagrelor has informed the FDA has based this decision on the THEMIS study, which included nearly 20,000 patients with stable CAD and type 2 diabetes.

This decision has come as a surprise for many, given the delicate balance this study has shown in terms of risk/benefit ratio, let alone the cost of this drug. 

In the THEMIS, ticagrelor significantly reduced the combined end point of major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, MI or stroke) compared against placebo (both arms received aspirin). This difference was significant, but in absolute terms event reduction was lower than 1% (7.7% vs 8.5%; p=0.04).


Read also: ESC 2019 | THEMIS: Ticagrelor in Diabetics with Stable Coronary Artery Disease.


In addition, this event reduction happened at the cost of a two-fold increase in major bleeding (2.2% vs.1.0%; p<0.001) and also intracranial bleeding (0.7% vs. 0.5%; p=0.005).


Read also: ESC 2019 | THEMIS-PCI: Unlike in the Main Study, Here Ticagrelor Is Indeed Effective.


In fact, when the THEMIS was presented last year at the ESC by Deepak Bhatt (one of the authors) it was said that for stable CAD patients with diabetes and no history of MI or stroke, the risk of bleeding counterbalanced the benefit of ticagrelor. 


Read also: THEMIS: Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Events in Delicate Balance for Chronic Ticagrelor.


Original Title: Brilinta approved in the US to reduce the risk of a first heart attack or stroke in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease.

Reference: AstraZeneca. Publicado el 01/06/2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...