Myocardial Injury in One Third of COVID-19 Patients

Roughly one third of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have some degree of myocardial injury and this comes hand in hand with increased mortality compared against patients with no troponin elevation. 

Manejo de los infartos durante la pandemia de Covid-19

Even mild forms of myocardial injury, such as 0.03 to 0.09 ng/mL troponin elevation, is associated with close to 100% increase in mortality (HR: 1.75; CI 95% 1.37-2.24).

In patients with greater injury (troponins over 0.09 ng/mL) mortality increases over 200% (HR 3.03; CI 95% 2.42-3.80).

This recent observational study soon to be published in JACC included 3069 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, hospitalized in New York.

The aim of this study was to better understand the prevalence of these troponin elevation and its impact on prognosis. 


Read also: Estimating the Risk of Infection for Healthcare Personnel.


Over 90% of patients were measured at least once for troponin-I elevation within 24hrs of admission. 455 of these showed mild elevation (0.03-0.09 ng/mL) and 530 significant elevation (> 0.09 ng/mL). 

Over one third of patients with significant elevation had previously been diagnosed with CAD. Atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure were also prevalent among patients with significant troponin-I elevation. 

The older the patient, the higher the body mass index and disease severity, the higher the mortality rate. After adjusting for covariables, troponin elevation continued to be a clear indicator of worse prognosis. 


Read also: Priorities in the Cath Lab to Escape COVID-19 Tsunami.


One of the limitations to this study was that other than troponin concentration no other tests were carried out, not even a 12-derivation electrocardiogram.      

With this information, we can conclude that troponin elevation is a prognosis marker, though it is hard to speculate about its etiology. 

It could be due to the cytokine storm or because of other acute phase reactants; it might also be the direct impact of the virus as myocarditis, or a non-ischemic myocardial injury due to the demand/offer imbalance, or a common acute coronary syndrome triggered by the inflammatory condition.


Read also: Covid-19 and Unaccounted Collateral Damage.


The COVID-19 pandemic history is being written and we are learning as we go. 

Original Title: Prevalence and impact of myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.

Reference: Lala A et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.20.20072702.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...