Myocardial Injury in One Third of COVID-19 Patients

Roughly one third of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have some degree of myocardial injury and this comes hand in hand with increased mortality compared against patients with no troponin elevation. 

Manejo de los infartos durante la pandemia de Covid-19

Even mild forms of myocardial injury, such as 0.03 to 0.09 ng/mL troponin elevation, is associated with close to 100% increase in mortality (HR: 1.75; CI 95% 1.37-2.24).

In patients with greater injury (troponins over 0.09 ng/mL) mortality increases over 200% (HR 3.03; CI 95% 2.42-3.80).

This recent observational study soon to be published in JACC included 3069 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, hospitalized in New York.

The aim of this study was to better understand the prevalence of these troponin elevation and its impact on prognosis. 


Read also: Estimating the Risk of Infection for Healthcare Personnel.


Over 90% of patients were measured at least once for troponin-I elevation within 24hrs of admission. 455 of these showed mild elevation (0.03-0.09 ng/mL) and 530 significant elevation (> 0.09 ng/mL). 

Over one third of patients with significant elevation had previously been diagnosed with CAD. Atrial fibrillation and cardiac failure were also prevalent among patients with significant troponin-I elevation. 

The older the patient, the higher the body mass index and disease severity, the higher the mortality rate. After adjusting for covariables, troponin elevation continued to be a clear indicator of worse prognosis. 


Read also: Priorities in the Cath Lab to Escape COVID-19 Tsunami.


One of the limitations to this study was that other than troponin concentration no other tests were carried out, not even a 12-derivation electrocardiogram.      

With this information, we can conclude that troponin elevation is a prognosis marker, though it is hard to speculate about its etiology. 

It could be due to the cytokine storm or because of other acute phase reactants; it might also be the direct impact of the virus as myocarditis, or a non-ischemic myocardial injury due to the demand/offer imbalance, or a common acute coronary syndrome triggered by the inflammatory condition.


Read also: Covid-19 and Unaccounted Collateral Damage.


The COVID-19 pandemic history is being written and we are learning as we go. 

Original Title: Prevalence and impact of myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.

Reference: Lala A et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.20.20072702.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

QFR vs. FFR: Is Coronary Revascularization Deferral Safe? Results from a FAVOR III Sub-Analysis

In cases of intermediate coronary lesions, functional assessment is recommended to aid the decision-making process regarding revascularization. There are several tools currently used to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...