COVID-19 PE: Nontraditional Risk Factors?

Risk factors for pulmonary embolism (PE) among patients with the new coronavirus are different from those traditionally observed.

Trombólisis local en tromboembolismo pulmonar

A French study recently published in Eur Heart J showed those new risk factors, and also that the risk of PE is reduced by the use of anticoagulant agents, just like in patients with conventional risk factors.

Initial reports had highlighted the increased incidence of PE among COVID-19 patients, but no consensus was reached regarding how and when anticoagulation should be indicated and at what dose.

This study suggests that anticoagulation therapy with a therapeutic dose administered before admission or anticoagulation therapy with a prophylactic dose during hospitalization could reduce the incidence of PE in accordance with the guidelines.

The study included 1240 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 among 24 French centers between February and April 2020. Overall, 103 (8.3%) subjects were diagnosed with PE by computed tomography pulmonary angiography.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | CARAVAGGIO: Apixaban in Venous Thromboembolism Associated to Cancer.


Those with PE required intensive care (31.1% vs 13.5%) and mechanical ventilation (24.3% vs 7.3%) more frequently than patients without such complication (p < 0.001 for both).

No surprises here, so far. What is interesting is that the incidence of PE did not affect the risk of mortality (p = 0.038).

Patients who received anticoagulation before admission (regardless of the clinical indication or regime) or anticoagulation with a prophylactic dose introduced during hospitalization were at a lower risk for PE.


Read also: Catheter-directed thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a safe technique.


In a multivariate analysis, traditional risk factors such as age, history of cancer, history of thromboembolic disease, smoking, and obesity were not associated with PE incidence, nor were cardiovascular comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart failure, or coronary artery disease (p > 0.05 for all).

However, male sex, duration of hospital stay, and biomarker evidence of systemic inflammation actually were independent predictors of PE.

The risk for bleeding remains unclear, but this information seems to be enough to indicate antithrombotic prophylaxis for patients admitted with COVID-19, regardless of their risk factors.

Original title: Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients: A French Multicentre Cohort Study.

Reference: Fauvel C. et al. Eur Heart J. 2020; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

A New Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Paradigm? CREST-2 Trial Unified Results

Severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis continues to be controversial seeing the optimization of intensive medical therapy (IMT) and the availability lower periprocedural risk revascularization techniques....

Impact of Baseline Systolic Blood Pressure on Blood Pressure Changes Following Renal Denervation

Renal denervation (RDN) is a guideline-recommended therapy to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, although uncertainties remain regarding which factors best predict...

Hypertriglyceridemia as Key Factor to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Development and Rupture: Genetic and Experimental Evidence

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a deadly vascular disease with no effective drug treatment, and risk of rupture reaching up to 80%. Even though...

Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes of Different Stroke Prevention Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 1 in every 4 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This population carries a high burden of comorbidities and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...