Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

COVID-19 PE: Nontraditional Risk Factors?

Risk factors for pulmonary embolism (PE) among patients with the new coronavirus are different from those traditionally observed.

Trombólisis local en tromboembolismo pulmonar

A French study recently published in Eur Heart J showed those new risk factors, and also that the risk of PE is reduced by the use of anticoagulant agents, just like in patients with conventional risk factors.

Initial reports had highlighted the increased incidence of PE among COVID-19 patients, but no consensus was reached regarding how and when anticoagulation should be indicated and at what dose.

This study suggests that anticoagulation therapy with a therapeutic dose administered before admission or anticoagulation therapy with a prophylactic dose during hospitalization could reduce the incidence of PE in accordance with the guidelines.

The study included 1240 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 among 24 French centers between February and April 2020. Overall, 103 (8.3%) subjects were diagnosed with PE by computed tomography pulmonary angiography.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | CARAVAGGIO: Apixaban in Venous Thromboembolism Associated to Cancer.


Those with PE required intensive care (31.1% vs 13.5%) and mechanical ventilation (24.3% vs 7.3%) more frequently than patients without such complication (p < 0.001 for both).

No surprises here, so far. What is interesting is that the incidence of PE did not affect the risk of mortality (p = 0.038).

Patients who received anticoagulation before admission (regardless of the clinical indication or regime) or anticoagulation with a prophylactic dose introduced during hospitalization were at a lower risk for PE.


Read also: Catheter-directed thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a safe technique.


In a multivariate analysis, traditional risk factors such as age, history of cancer, history of thromboembolic disease, smoking, and obesity were not associated with PE incidence, nor were cardiovascular comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart failure, or coronary artery disease (p > 0.05 for all).

However, male sex, duration of hospital stay, and biomarker evidence of systemic inflammation actually were independent predictors of PE.

The risk for bleeding remains unclear, but this information seems to be enough to indicate antithrombotic prophylaxis for patients admitted with COVID-19, regardless of their risk factors.

Original title: Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients: A French Multicentre Cohort Study.

Reference: Fauvel C. et al. Eur Heart J. 2020; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

C-TRACT: Endovascular therapy in post-thrombotic syndrome due to iliac obstruction

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is one of the most limiting sequelae following proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It clinically manifests as chronic pain, edema, skin...

Coil embolization of segmental arteries as a spinal cord protection strategy prior to complex endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aorta

Spinal cord ischemia remains one of the most devastating complications in the repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with incidences of up to 20–30% in extensive...

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...