COVID-19 PE: Nontraditional Risk Factors?

Risk factors for pulmonary embolism (PE) among patients with the new coronavirus are different from those traditionally observed.

Trombólisis local en tromboembolismo pulmonar

A French study recently published in Eur Heart J showed those new risk factors, and also that the risk of PE is reduced by the use of anticoagulant agents, just like in patients with conventional risk factors.

Initial reports had highlighted the increased incidence of PE among COVID-19 patients, but no consensus was reached regarding how and when anticoagulation should be indicated and at what dose.

This study suggests that anticoagulation therapy with a therapeutic dose administered before admission or anticoagulation therapy with a prophylactic dose during hospitalization could reduce the incidence of PE in accordance with the guidelines.

The study included 1240 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 among 24 French centers between February and April 2020. Overall, 103 (8.3%) subjects were diagnosed with PE by computed tomography pulmonary angiography.


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | CARAVAGGIO: Apixaban in Venous Thromboembolism Associated to Cancer.


Those with PE required intensive care (31.1% vs 13.5%) and mechanical ventilation (24.3% vs 7.3%) more frequently than patients without such complication (p < 0.001 for both).

No surprises here, so far. What is interesting is that the incidence of PE did not affect the risk of mortality (p = 0.038).

Patients who received anticoagulation before admission (regardless of the clinical indication or regime) or anticoagulation with a prophylactic dose introduced during hospitalization were at a lower risk for PE.


Read also: Catheter-directed thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism: a safe technique.


In a multivariate analysis, traditional risk factors such as age, history of cancer, history of thromboembolic disease, smoking, and obesity were not associated with PE incidence, nor were cardiovascular comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart failure, or coronary artery disease (p > 0.05 for all).

However, male sex, duration of hospital stay, and biomarker evidence of systemic inflammation actually were independent predictors of PE.

The risk for bleeding remains unclear, but this information seems to be enough to indicate antithrombotic prophylaxis for patients admitted with COVID-19, regardless of their risk factors.

Original title: Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Patients: A French Multicentre Cohort Study.

Reference: Fauvel C. et al. Eur Heart J. 2020; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...