ESC 2020 | Revascularization Strategies: Ventricular Dysfunction Might Tilt the Scales

Patients included in the ISCHEMIA trial who had a history of cardiac failure or ventricular function deterioration will benefit from revascularization vs. optimal medical treatment. This is a pre-specified analysis of the paradigmatic ISCHEMIA trial.

ESC 2020 | La disfunción ventricular puede inclinar la balanza para decidir la revascularización

The ISCHEMIA was published in March 2020 in NEJM and went somewhat unnoticed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

At the time, the ISCHEMIA-CKD also came out; it looked at a population of higher baseline risk (patients with chronic kidney disease) and also failed to show revascularization benefits. 

Now, from the ESC 2020, we receive information on another high risk subgroup: patients with cardiac failure or ventricular function deterioration. 

These findings suggest that stable patients with moderate to severe ischemia and evidence of mild ventricular function deterioration will benefit from a more invasive therapy such as revascularization (be it percutaneous or surgical). 


Read also: Virtual ACC 2020 | Controversial Trial ISCHEMIA Finally in NEJM.


According to Dr. Renato Lopes, presenter and main author of this study, these results only generate hypothesis given the small number of patients with ventricular function deterioration included in the study. 

Of the 5129 patients included in the ISCHEMIA, only 4% had a history of cardiac failure and only 1.1% had required hospitalization because of it. Mean ventricular function of the global population was 60% vs 44% of this small subgroup of higher risk.

The combined end point occurred in 17.2% of patients undergoing revascularization vs. 29.3% of patients receiving the conservative therapy (p=0.055).


Read also: AHA 2019 | ISCHEMIA: The Invasive Approach (PCI or Surgery) Results Similar to Optimal Medical Treatment.


Revascularization type was split between PCI and CABG, depending on immediate risk and protection against future events at long term. 

These outcomes are on the same line of the STITCHES outcomes and call for further research. 

Original Title: Initial invasive versus conservative management for stable ischemic heart disease with a history of heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the ISCHEMIA trial.

Reference: Lopes R, et al. Presentado en forma virtual en el congreso ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...