Do We Need to See a Cardiologist before a Carotid Endarterectomy?

Cardiac complications are among the most frequent in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic lesions. 

Otro “escándalo” en la medicina basada en la evidencia ¿El monitoreo ambulatorio de presión puesto en duda?

This excess of cardiac events in patients with no neurological symptoms of carotid stenosis is essential to balance the risk/benefit ratio of carotid endarterectomy. 

A routine cardiology consultation prior surgery could reduce perioperative infarction rate, general complications and even mortality. 

Compared against surgeons, interventional cardiologists have perfected the technique, tried different cerebral protection systems and introduced new stents to reduce stroke (especially minor periprocedural stroke) expecting to reduce cardiac events. 

On the one hand, surgeons have a much simpler tool, cheaper and faster, to improve their Achilles heel. 


Read also: Outflow Tract Calcification and the Best Valve in This Context.


The analysis included nearly 2000 consecutive patients receiving carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis between 2007 and 2017. 

Between 2007 and 2012, only select patients were monitored at cardiology consultations and since 2012 consultation has been routine. 

The group included as of 2012 more often presented a history of coronary intervention (0.5% vs. 5.1%; p<0.001), were on dual antiaggregation therapy (4.6% vs. 9.5%; p=0.001), in addition to statins (60.3% vs. 72.4%; p<0.001) and cardiovascular drugs in general (1.77 ± 1.22 vs. 1.92 ± 1.23; p=0.01) at the time of surgery.


Read also: ESC 2020 | Ticagrelor Might Increase Bleeding and Mortality in the Elderly.


Neurological events resulted similar in both groups (0.8% vs. 0.3%; p=0.20) and hospital mortality resulted identical (0.1%; p=1).

The difference was observed in cardiac complications in general (3.4% vs. 1.9%; p=0.05) and in myocardial infarctions in particular (1.6% vs. 0.6%; p=0.05). 

Multivariable analysis confirmed routine cardiology consultation is an independent predictor of infarction (OR: 0.61; p=0.04) and cardiac complications.


Read also: ESC 2020 | Rivaroxaban Might Reduce Cardiac Cerebral and Peripheral Events.


At 5 years, survival resulted similar (84.2% vs. 82.4%; p=0.72) but with a significantly lower number of cardiac deaths in the group with cardiology consultation.

Conclusion

Routine cardiology consultation before carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic lesions reduces perioperative infarction and cardiac death rates at long term. This protocol should be considered when examining the risk/benefit ratio of endarterectomy. 

Original Title: Clinical Impact of Routine Cardiology Consultation Prior to Elective Carotid Endarterectomy in Neurologically Asymptomatic Patients.

Reference: Francesco Squizzato et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, article in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.007.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

New Carotid PCI All-in-One System

Carotid stenting is equivalent to carotid endarterectomy in terms of major adverse events (death, AMI, and stroke). However, it entails higher risk of minor...

PERFORMANCE II Trial: Safety and Efficacy of the New NeuroGuard Carotid Stent System

The percutaneous treatment of carotid artery disease through stenting (CAS) for the prevention of cerebrovascular disease has proven to be an effective alternative compared...

Trends in the Treatment of Critical Lower Limb Ischemia

Approximately 25% of patients with critical lower limb ischemia (CLLI) face amputation within the first year after diagnosis (according to statistics from the United...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Unplanned Coronary Angiography After TAVR: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes

The importance of assessing coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is well recognized due to the high prevalence of...

Intravascular Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Lesions: Success Predictors

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is increasingly common in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has been established as an effective tool...

TAVR Unload: TAVR in Moderate Aortic Stenosis and Ventricular Function Deterioration

Aortic Stenosis (AS) significantly contributes to valvulo-arterial impedance in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), making it a relevant therapeutic target...