Do We Need to See a Cardiologist before a Carotid Endarterectomy?

Cardiac complications are among the most frequent in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic lesions. 

Otro “escándalo” en la medicina basada en la evidencia ¿El monitoreo ambulatorio de presión puesto en duda?

This excess of cardiac events in patients with no neurological symptoms of carotid stenosis is essential to balance the risk/benefit ratio of carotid endarterectomy. 

A routine cardiology consultation prior surgery could reduce perioperative infarction rate, general complications and even mortality. 

Compared against surgeons, interventional cardiologists have perfected the technique, tried different cerebral protection systems and introduced new stents to reduce stroke (especially minor periprocedural stroke) expecting to reduce cardiac events. 

On the one hand, surgeons have a much simpler tool, cheaper and faster, to improve their Achilles heel. 


Read also: Outflow Tract Calcification and the Best Valve in This Context.


The analysis included nearly 2000 consecutive patients receiving carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis between 2007 and 2017. 

Between 2007 and 2012, only select patients were monitored at cardiology consultations and since 2012 consultation has been routine. 

The group included as of 2012 more often presented a history of coronary intervention (0.5% vs. 5.1%; p<0.001), were on dual antiaggregation therapy (4.6% vs. 9.5%; p=0.001), in addition to statins (60.3% vs. 72.4%; p<0.001) and cardiovascular drugs in general (1.77 ± 1.22 vs. 1.92 ± 1.23; p=0.01) at the time of surgery.


Read also: ESC 2020 | Ticagrelor Might Increase Bleeding and Mortality in the Elderly.


Neurological events resulted similar in both groups (0.8% vs. 0.3%; p=0.20) and hospital mortality resulted identical (0.1%; p=1).

The difference was observed in cardiac complications in general (3.4% vs. 1.9%; p=0.05) and in myocardial infarctions in particular (1.6% vs. 0.6%; p=0.05). 

Multivariable analysis confirmed routine cardiology consultation is an independent predictor of infarction (OR: 0.61; p=0.04) and cardiac complications.


Read also: ESC 2020 | Rivaroxaban Might Reduce Cardiac Cerebral and Peripheral Events.


At 5 years, survival resulted similar (84.2% vs. 82.4%; p=0.72) but with a significantly lower number of cardiac deaths in the group with cardiology consultation.

Conclusion

Routine cardiology consultation before carotid endarterectomy in patients with asymptomatic lesions reduces perioperative infarction and cardiac death rates at long term. This protocol should be considered when examining the risk/benefit ratio of endarterectomy. 

Original Title: Clinical Impact of Routine Cardiology Consultation Prior to Elective Carotid Endarterectomy in Neurologically Asymptomatic Patients.

Reference: Francesco Squizzato et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, article in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.11.007.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

ACVC 2026 | BOX Substudy: Mean Arterial Pressure Targets in Cardiogenic Shock After OHCA

Hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock following ischemic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA-AMICS) remains an unresolved issue, particularly regarding optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...