Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in ST Elevation MI

In patients undergoing ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving primary PCI, no significative differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor were found. However, the latter was associated to a significantly higher number of repeat MI when considered separately. 

ticagrelor vs. aspirina

Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of the two most potent oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. There is a large body of evidence resulting from studies comparing each of them separately vs clopidogrel, but not against each other. 

This analysis prespecified in the ISAR REACT-5 protocol included 1653 STEMI patients randomized to ticagrelor or prasugrel.

The primary end point was a composite of death, MI and stroke at one year after randomization. The secondary end point was the incidence of major bleeding (BARC 3 to 5) for the same period. 

The combined end point occurred in 10.1% of patients in the ticagrelor group vs 7.9% of prasugrel patients (p=0.10). When considering its separate components, they observed similar results in death (4.9% vs 4.7%, p=0.83) and stroke (1.3% vs 1%, p=0.46), as well as definite thrombosis (1.8% vs 1%, p=0.15). 


Read also: TCT 2020 | Ticagrelor Monotherapy After ST-Segment Elevation Infarction.


The difference in new events rate was significant, prasugrel winning with 2.8% against 5.3% of ticagrelor (p=0.010). This difference tends to disappear with all events combined. 

Major bleeding rates according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC 3 to 5) were practically identical with 6.1% for ticagrelor and 5.1% for prasugrel (p=0.36).

Conclusion

In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI there were no differences in the combined primary end point between ticagrelor and prasugrel. When considering MI separately, prasugrel has an advantage. 

Original Title: Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Alp Aytekin et al. Circulation. 2020, Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...