Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in ST Elevation MI

In patients undergoing ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving primary PCI, no significative differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor were found. However, the latter was associated to a significantly higher number of repeat MI when considered separately. 

ticagrelor vs. aspirina

Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of the two most potent oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. There is a large body of evidence resulting from studies comparing each of them separately vs clopidogrel, but not against each other. 

This analysis prespecified in the ISAR REACT-5 protocol included 1653 STEMI patients randomized to ticagrelor or prasugrel.

The primary end point was a composite of death, MI and stroke at one year after randomization. The secondary end point was the incidence of major bleeding (BARC 3 to 5) for the same period. 

The combined end point occurred in 10.1% of patients in the ticagrelor group vs 7.9% of prasugrel patients (p=0.10). When considering its separate components, they observed similar results in death (4.9% vs 4.7%, p=0.83) and stroke (1.3% vs 1%, p=0.46), as well as definite thrombosis (1.8% vs 1%, p=0.15). 


Read also: TCT 2020 | Ticagrelor Monotherapy After ST-Segment Elevation Infarction.


The difference in new events rate was significant, prasugrel winning with 2.8% against 5.3% of ticagrelor (p=0.010). This difference tends to disappear with all events combined. 

Major bleeding rates according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC 3 to 5) were practically identical with 6.1% for ticagrelor and 5.1% for prasugrel (p=0.36).

Conclusion

In STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI there were no differences in the combined primary end point between ticagrelor and prasugrel. When considering MI separately, prasugrel has an advantage. 

Original Title: Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients with ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Reference: Alp Aytekin et al. Circulation. 2020, Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...