Should Total Occlusion Influence on Revascularization Strategy?

Success or failure of total occlusion (TO) revascularization does not affect mortality at 10 years, and this does not depend on revascularization strategy (PCI vs surgery) or location. 

 estrategia de revascularización

The long-term clinical benefit of recanalization and PCI or TO artery bypass graft remains nuclear. 

This is a sub-study of the SYNTAXES (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Extended Survival) that randomized patients with at least one TO. 

Of 1800 patients randomized to PCI vs surgery, 460 presented at least one TO.

TO revascularization, or its absence, did not affect mortality at 10 years, regardless the strategy (PCI Branch: 29.9% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.982 and surgery branch: 28.0% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.330).


Read also: Major Cause of Myocardial Injury by COVID-19.


Neither were there differences between recanalization or revascularization if TO was to the left main or to the anterior descending artery (34.5% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.837). 

Conclusion

Recanalization with PCI or revascularization with surgery of a total occlusion does not affect mortality at 10 years, irrespective of strategy type or TO location. 

These data support the contemporary practice claiming recanalization should be offered in specialized high-volume centers to patients with angina refractory to optimal medical treatment and with confirmed myocardial viability. 

Original Title: Mortality 10 Years After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Total Coronary Artery Occlusions.

Reference: Hideyuki Kawashima et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 9;77(5):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.055.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...