Should Total Occlusion Influence on Revascularization Strategy?

Success or failure of total occlusion (TO) revascularization does not affect mortality at 10 years, and this does not depend on revascularization strategy (PCI vs surgery) or location. 

 estrategia de revascularización

The long-term clinical benefit of recanalization and PCI or TO artery bypass graft remains nuclear. 

This is a sub-study of the SYNTAXES (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Extended Survival) that randomized patients with at least one TO. 

Of 1800 patients randomized to PCI vs surgery, 460 presented at least one TO.

TO revascularization, or its absence, did not affect mortality at 10 years, regardless the strategy (PCI Branch: 29.9% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.982 and surgery branch: 28.0% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.330).


Read also: Major Cause of Myocardial Injury by COVID-19.


Neither were there differences between recanalization or revascularization if TO was to the left main or to the anterior descending artery (34.5% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.837). 

Conclusion

Recanalization with PCI or revascularization with surgery of a total occlusion does not affect mortality at 10 years, irrespective of strategy type or TO location. 

These data support the contemporary practice claiming recanalization should be offered in specialized high-volume centers to patients with angina refractory to optimal medical treatment and with confirmed myocardial viability. 

Original Title: Mortality 10 Years After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Total Coronary Artery Occlusions.

Reference: Hideyuki Kawashima et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 9;77(5):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.055.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...