Should Total Occlusion Influence on Revascularization Strategy?

Success or failure of total occlusion (TO) revascularization does not affect mortality at 10 years, and this does not depend on revascularization strategy (PCI vs surgery) or location. 

 estrategia de revascularización

The long-term clinical benefit of recanalization and PCI or TO artery bypass graft remains nuclear. 

This is a sub-study of the SYNTAXES (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Extended Survival) that randomized patients with at least one TO. 

Of 1800 patients randomized to PCI vs surgery, 460 presented at least one TO.

TO revascularization, or its absence, did not affect mortality at 10 years, regardless the strategy (PCI Branch: 29.9% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.982 and surgery branch: 28.0% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.330).


Read also: Major Cause of Myocardial Injury by COVID-19.


Neither were there differences between recanalization or revascularization if TO was to the left main or to the anterior descending artery (34.5% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.837). 

Conclusion

Recanalization with PCI or revascularization with surgery of a total occlusion does not affect mortality at 10 years, irrespective of strategy type or TO location. 

These data support the contemporary practice claiming recanalization should be offered in specialized high-volume centers to patients with angina refractory to optimal medical treatment and with confirmed myocardial viability. 

Original Title: Mortality 10 Years After Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Total Coronary Artery Occlusions.

Reference: Hideyuki Kawashima et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 9;77(5):529-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.055.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....