EuroPCR 2021 | FUTURE II: Bioresorbable Scaffolds Reloaded

A new sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with far thinner struts resulted non inferior to the Xience as to the end point of angiographic in-segment late loss (LL) powered for noninferiority testing. Even though this is a small study with angiographic end points, it might be the first step towards the return of bioresorbable scaffolds. 

EuroPCR 2021 | FUTURE II: las plataformas bioabsorbibles vuelven recargadas

Part of this success was attributed to the thinner struts, but also to a refined implantation technique and correct lesion selection.

With struts of 100 to 125 microns, the new scaffold called Firesorb is far thinner than the discontinued Absorb, but even thicker than contemporary DES. This technology has made impressive progress in the right direction but still has a long way to go. 

We should bear in mind that one year ABSORB III outcomes, showing non-inferiority for the discontinued scaffold vs. Xience, was what got it the FDA approval for clinical use. It was long after when data with twice as many events associated to the scaffold was reported, including target vessel MI and thrombosis, vs. Xience. 

Absorb width of 150 microns created a more turbulent flow, delayed endothelization and reabsorption. The 100 to 125 microns of the Firesorb provide a theoretical advantage. 


Read also: EuroPCR 2021 | CLASP: 2 Year Outcomes of the New Mitral Valve Repair System.


The FUTURE II was a prospective multicenter study randomizing to Firesorb vs Xience 430 patients with planned PCI for myocardial ischemia and lesion to one or two vessels. Lesions had to be 25 mm or les in vessels between 2.5- and 4-mm diameter. 

The angiographic primary end point was in-segment late loss (LL) and secondary end point was 1-year proportion of covered struts assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

The angiographic primary end point reached non-inferiority as did the proportion of covered struts by OCT.


Read also: Very Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Complex PCI.


Target vessel failure (combination of all cause death, any MI or any revascularization) also resulted similar with 1.9% for Firesorb and 3.3% for Xience (p=0.37). There was no definite or probable thrombosis in any patient. 

Original Title: Thinner-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: the FUTURE II trial.

Reference: Lei Song et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. May 18, 2021. Online before print. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.048.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an...

EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction

Despite steady progress in secondary prevention and medical treatment optimization (OMT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbimortality....

Left or Right Transradial Approach? Comparing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures

Radiation exposure during percutaneous procedures is a problem both for patients and operators. The transradial is currently the preferred approach, vs. femoral; however, whether...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...