Post TAVR Acute Coronary Syndrome: Frequency and Potential Damage

After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are rare and mostly present as non-ST elevation events. In this context, the few ST elevation events have bad prognosis, with close to 30% mortality at 30 days. 

Síndromes coronarios agudos post TAVI ¿Qué tan frecuente y que tan malos son?

This study included patients undergoing TAVR between 2012 and 2017 admitted for acute coronary syndrome during followup. 

Of 142,845 patients analyzed, 6741 (only 4.7%) were admitted afterwards for and ACS within mean 297 days. Half these patients were admitted within 6 months. 

A history of coronary artery disease, prior revascularization, diabetes, valve in valve and kidney injury, at the time of TAVR, predicted future coronary events. 

ST elevation MIs (STEMI) were associated with higher mortality at 30 days and one year compared against non-STEMI events (31.4% vs. 15.5% and 51.2% vs. 41.3%, respectively; p<0.01).


Read also: Which Type 2 Endoleaks Should We Intervene?


One third of non-STEMI patients were treated percutaneously. This strategy was associated to lower mortality at long term, but higher risk of repeat revascularization. 

Conclusion

After TAVR, ACS seldom occurs and mostly happens as non-ST elevation MI. The few STEMI events had high mortality at short term. 

Original Title: Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Amgad Mentias et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2020, article in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.11.027.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...