Ticagrelor or Prasugrel for Acute Patients Who Undergo Angioplasty

We are still asking the same question: ticagrelor or prasugrel? With narrow margins between these drugs in terms of efficacy and bleeding, it is difficult to decide which to prescribe.

Ticagrelor o prasugrel en pacientes agudos que reciben angioplastia

While it has certain methodological limitations, this research published in JAMA seems to clarify the picture at least for patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo angioplasty.

This pre-specified post-randomization analysis included a subgroup of 3377 patients with acute coronary syndrome. Patients were randomized to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel prior to angioplasty.

The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was BARC 3-5 bleeding.

Both arms, ticagrelor (n = 1676) and prasugrel (n = 1701), were well matched for clinical characteristics. 

The primary endpoint occurred in 9.8% of patients in the ticagrelor arm vs. 7.1% in the prasugrel arm (hazard ratio: 1.41; 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.78; p = 0.005). Prasugrel was also better when considering infarction only (5.3% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.03)


Read also: Novel DES Technology Promises to Become the Next DES Generation.


Researchers expected ticagrelor to perhaps compensate for thrombotic events due to its historical safety as regards bleeding (carried over from the PLATO study), but this was not the case: both drugs had similar rates of BARC 3-5 bleeding (5.3% vs 4.9%; p = 0.54).

Conclusion

In patients with acute coronary syndrome who undergo angioplasty, the incidence of the primary endpoint was less frequent among those who received prasugrel, with no incidence on bleeding.

This places prasugrel as a superior strategy, although not definitely; observations are from a post-randomization subgroup, so further dedicated studies are required to reach a final conclusion.

jamacardiology-coughlan-2021-oi-210043-1623426142-46029

Original Title: Ticagrelor or Prasugrel for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Reference: J. J. Coughlan et al. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 30. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2228. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...